2016
DOI: 10.1149/2.0871613jes
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computationally Efficient Pseudo-2D Non-Isothermal Modeling of Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Fuel Cells with Two-Phase Phenomena

Abstract: In this article, a computationally efficient pseudo-2D model for real-time dynamic simulations of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs) is developed with a specific focus on water and thermal management. The model accounts for temperature dynamics, two-phase flow and flooding in the diffusion media, and membrane water crossover as well as absorption and desorption processes. Computational efficiency is achieved by leveraging the disparate time scales within the system dynamics, in addition to exploi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 104 publications
(193 reference statements)
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Along-the-channel marching methods combined with MEA cross-section models have been extensively used to model complete cells [42,[54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61].…”
Section: Diagnostic Methods Are Critical To Analyze Cell Performance mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Along-the-channel marching methods combined with MEA cross-section models have been extensively used to model complete cells [42,[54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61].…”
Section: Diagnostic Methods Are Critical To Analyze Cell Performance mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These two contributions are in the case of a full analytic solution an infinite series of Fourier terms [23] whereas in the case of HAN-RT only the first two terms are taken into account and, using the expressions for the concentration and velocity profile given in Eqs. (17) and (14), respectively, are computed as follows:…”
Section: Gdlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The so called reduced dimensionality models in their broader sense, i.e., any model that does not address all three dimensions equally, are a typically answer to the need for a balance between computational speed and accuracy of results. Common reduced dimensionality models are the 2D models (e.g., , ), combined 2D and 1D models and the so called 1D+1D models (e.g., , , ), which are a simplification of the 2D models (models where only the most dominant physical phenomena – e.g., mass transport via bulk gas flow in channel – are addressed in the dimension that runs along direction of gas flow). The 2D modeling approach leads to certain systematic discrepancies that are sometimes compensated by means of correction parameters yielding the pseudo 3D modeling approach (e.g., , , the Sherwood number adjusted 2D model in and the model of ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, earlier models were mostly lumped parameter with no distribution [4], or 1D, capturing the distributions in either the through-the-membrane [7] or along-the-channel [8] directions. More recently, most of the models have evolved to 2D computational domains capturing land-channel variations [9][10][11] or along the channel distributions [12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, our specific focus is on capturing temperature and water distributions throughout the cell, which is achieved through a pseudo-2D bi-domain modeling approach. In particular, this work draws from our earlier effort in this area [13,27] and enhances it as follows: i) the bi-domain modeling approach allows for capturing of the in-plane distributions, ii) the microporous layer (MPL) is explicitly accounted for and is no longer lumped with the gas diffusion layer (GDL), while the catalyst layer (CL) is treated as a component with finite thickness rather than an interface, iii) the counter-flow configuration is modeled while maintaining real-time computation capabilities, iv) the model is more efficiently implemented to allow for significant savings in computation time, and v) the model is experimentally validated with performance data from a differential cell and an automotive short stack under a variety of operating conditions. These modifications render the model suitable for real-time monitoring of unmeasured and critical states within the fuel cell stack.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%