2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11528-016-0087-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational Thinking for All: Pedagogical Approaches to Embedding 21st Century Problem Solving in K-12 Classrooms

Abstract: The recent focus on computational thinking as a key 21st century skill for all students has led to a number of curriculum initiatives to embed it in K-12 classrooms. In this paper, we discuss the key computational thinking constructs, including algorithms, abstraction, and automation. We further discuss how these ideas are related to current educational reforms, such as Common Core and Next Generation Science Standards and provide specific means that would allow teachers to embed these ideas in their K-12 clas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
123
0
19

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 329 publications
(181 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
4
123
0
19
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, studies on the integration of CT into the curriculum and the studies on the significance of CT in education were started to be conducted on 2013. However, these studies included significant findings such as the integration of CT in education (Israel et al, 2015;Navlakha & Bar, 2016, Voogt et al, 2015Yadav, Hong, & Stephenson, 2016), reorganization of the curriculum based on CT skills (Grover, Pea, & Cooper, 2015;Jun, Han, Kim, & Lee, 2014;Vallance & Towndrow, 2016;Zapata-Ros, 2015) and the requirement of including CT in teacher training (Yadav, Mayfield, Zhou, Hambrusch, & Korb, 2014, Yadav et al, 2016. However, it is important to understand and assess the constructs associated with CT in order to integrate this skill effectively into education.…”
Section: Conclusion and Recommendations For Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, studies on the integration of CT into the curriculum and the studies on the significance of CT in education were started to be conducted on 2013. However, these studies included significant findings such as the integration of CT in education (Israel et al, 2015;Navlakha & Bar, 2016, Voogt et al, 2015Yadav, Hong, & Stephenson, 2016), reorganization of the curriculum based on CT skills (Grover, Pea, & Cooper, 2015;Jun, Han, Kim, & Lee, 2014;Vallance & Towndrow, 2016;Zapata-Ros, 2015) and the requirement of including CT in teacher training (Yadav, Mayfield, Zhou, Hambrusch, & Korb, 2014, Yadav et al, 2016. However, it is important to understand and assess the constructs associated with CT in order to integrate this skill effectively into education.…”
Section: Conclusion and Recommendations For Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Öğrencilerin bilgisayarca düşünme beceri düzeyleri ile problem çözme beceri düzeyleri arasında pozitif yönde, orta düzeyde ve anlamlı bir ilişkinin olduğu görülmektedir. Bilgisayarca düşünmenin mantıksal matematiksel zekâ (Barr, Harrison, & Conery, 2011) ve problem çözme becerisi ile ilişkisi olduğunu ifade eden (Gonzalez, Gonzalez, & Fernandez, 2016;Yadav, Zhou, Mayfield, Hambrusch, & Korb, 2011;Yadav, Hong, & Stephenson, 2016;Wing, 2010) çalışmalar bulunmaktadır. Bilgisayarca düşünmenin karmaşık problemlerin çözümü için sistem tasarlamada matematiksel düşünmeden faydalandığı bilinmektedir (Lu & Fletscher 2009;Wing 2008;Wing, 2010).…”
Section: Sonuç Ve Tartışmaunclassified
“…However, students' problem-solving behavior is a complex process involving different stages -problem decomposition, abstraction, and execution [35,41]. It is critical to figure out different stages to better understand and predict their influence on individuals' performance [40] rather than treating it as a whole solving period.…”
Section: Problem-solving Feature Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%