2010
DOI: 10.1021/jo9016452
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational Studies of Ion-Pair Separation of Benzylic Organolithium Compounds in THF: Importance of Explicit and Implicit Solvation

Abstract: Ion-pair separation (IPS) of THF-solvated fluorenyl (1(C)), diphenylmethyl (2(C)), and trityl (3(C)) lithium was studied computationally. Minimum energy equilibrium geometries of explicit bis- and tris-solvated contact ion pairs (CIPs) and tetrakis-solvated separated ion pairs (SIPs) were located at B3LYP/6-31G*. Associative transition structures linking the tris-solvated CIPs and tetrakis-solvated SIPs were also located. Based on MP2/6-31G*//B3LYP/6-31G* energies, the resting states of the CIPs are predicted … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The intermediate 17 may dissociate to produce the free 2azaallyl anion 18 and the monophosphine allylpalladium cation 11 as either a solvent separated or a contact ion pair. While it is nontrivial to calculate an accurate energy value for a contact ion pair, [34] the calculated value for the solvent separated ion pair 11+18, À0.2 kcal mol À1 , represents an upper energetic limit. Attack by the 2-azaallyl anion nucleophile onto the allyl ligand opposite to the Pd center would produce the product 3 ( Figure 6).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The intermediate 17 may dissociate to produce the free 2azaallyl anion 18 and the monophosphine allylpalladium cation 11 as either a solvent separated or a contact ion pair. While it is nontrivial to calculate an accurate energy value for a contact ion pair, [34] the calculated value for the solvent separated ion pair 11+18, À0.2 kcal mol À1 , represents an upper energetic limit. Attack by the 2-azaallyl anion nucleophile onto the allyl ligand opposite to the Pd center would produce the product 3 ( Figure 6).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[84][85][86][87][88][89] Moreover, considering the same symmetry number [90] (s = 2) for S2 (average C 2v ) and S3 (average C 2h ), and assuming the distortion modes and planarity to be similar for both porphyrin macrocycles, there is no obvious reason to expect any significant difference between the entropy energies of S2 and S3 (although the significant difference in their dipole moments may influence their entropy and/or enthalpy through solvation effects). [76,91] It is therefore reasonable to assume that, in our case, the variation in entropy for the interconversion of the S2 and S3 atropisomers must be at least negligible with respect to the highly enthalpic-dependent energy barriers to rotation. Thus, assuming DG°to be independent of the temperature (with DG°T = DH°ÀTDS°and DS°% 0) gives DG°% DH°, and the values of DG°of 115.2 and 116.9 kJ mol À1 for S2 and S3, respectively, at 355 K should be roughly the same as those at room temperature, which corresponds to a half-life in the range of months to a year at room temperature.…”
Section: Atropisomerisation Of S2 and S3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It thus seems likely that solvent electrostriction plays a significant role in the kinetics and thermodynamics of many ionogenic reactions, including the enantiomerization of stabilized organolithium compounds in ethereal solvents 1f. 11, 28…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%