2018
DOI: 10.1093/bib/bby002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational prediction of drug–target interactions using chemogenomic approaches: an empirical survey

Abstract: Computational prediction of drug-target interactions (DTIs) has become an essential task in the drug discovery process. It narrows down the search space for interactions by suggesting potential interaction candidates for validation via wet-lab experiments that are well known to be expensive and time-consuming. In this article, we aim to provide a comprehensive overview and empirical evaluation on the computational DTI prediction techniques, to act as a guide and reference for our fellow researchers. Specifical… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
162
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 201 publications
(162 citation statements)
references
References 148 publications
0
162
0
Order By: Relevance
“…X m×n can be expressed as a product of two matrices U m×r and V r×n . The complete matrix factorization problem (1) can be framed as, (2).…”
Section: Matrix Factorizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…X m×n can be expressed as a product of two matrices U m×r and V r×n . The complete matrix factorization problem (1) can be framed as, (2).…”
Section: Matrix Factorizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventionally, this was done through time-taking and expensive wet-lab experiments. In recent times, the introduction of computational techniques for prediction of interaction probability [1][2][3][4] has paved the way for appropriate and effective alternatives which could help avoid costly candidate failures. These methods take some existing experimentally valid interactions which are publicly available in databases like STITCH [5], ChEMBL [6], KEGG DRUG [7], DrugBank [8] and SuperTarget [9] to predict the interaction probability of unknown drug-target pairs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations