2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-43195-2_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational Parametric Studies for Preclinical Evaluation of Total Knee Replacements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2,3 Progress has been made to understand material and design factors, as well as important patient factors such as age and activity. 2,4 Although, there have been computational biomechanics models that demonstrated the influence of surgical alignment on tibiofemoral kinematics, kinetics, and wear, 5,6 with the exception of grossly malpositioned components, there is little knowledge about the impact of implant positioning on wear. Part of the reason for this paucity is the difficulty to reliably measure tibial liner wear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,3 Progress has been made to understand material and design factors, as well as important patient factors such as age and activity. 2,4 Although, there have been computational biomechanics models that demonstrated the influence of surgical alignment on tibiofemoral kinematics, kinetics, and wear, 5,6 with the exception of grossly malpositioned components, there is little knowledge about the impact of implant positioning on wear. Part of the reason for this paucity is the difficulty to reliably measure tibial liner wear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There was a significant difference in wear rates between the lubricants, F(3, 24) = 46.72, p < 0.001. The estimated wear rate was 11.27 mg/MC (95% CI [9.21, 13.3 [26] wear tests run on the same machine with the same loading and motion profiles, but using a standard calf serum-based solution, had a higher wear rate than Low FA/BSA but a lower rate than pure BSA. This data and the calculated specific wear rates are shown in Table 2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The wear rates and mechanisms of this study agree well with simulator studies. Using POD wear tests with the same load and kinematic input as used here, Mell et al [26] were able to predict knee simulator wear rates computationally. In addition, the observed wear features (particularly the protrusions) have been observed during hip simulator wear testing, as well as on in vivo components after retrieval [31].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A previously published computational framework 16,17,35 was used to perform a parametric study to investigate the influence of variability in kinematic and kinetic input waveforms on wear variability. The framework leverages a finite element analysis (FEA) model of TKR wear and contact and has been previously validated against several independent experimental tests.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The framework leverages a finite element analysis (FEA) model of TKR wear and contact and has been previously validated against several independent experimental tests. 16,17,35 The FEA model used is of a NexGen CR TKR (Zimmer-Biomet, Warsaw, IN) with the femoral component modeled as a rigid body using 4627 quadratic surface elements. The polyethylene tibial insert is modeled as a deformable body using the J2 plasticity model with an elastic modulus of 1051 MPa and a Poisson's ratio of 0.46 36 and is comprised of 78,108 linear hexahedral elements.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%