The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2009
DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.1085-09.2009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational Models of Millisecond Level Duration Tuning in Neural Circuits

Abstract: Discrimination of stimulus duration on the order of milliseconds has been observed in behavioral and neurophysiological studies across a variety of species and taxa. Several studies conducted in mammals have found neurons in the auditory midbrain (inferior colliculus) that are selective for signal duration. Duration selectivity in these cells arises from an interaction of excitatory and inhibitory events occurring at particular latencies from stimulus onset and offset. As previously shown in barn owls, coincid… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
57
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
2
57
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Some are circuit-based models that rely on the temporal interaction and integration of excitatory and inhibitory synaptic inputs at the DTN (Casseday et al, , 2000Fuzessery and Hall, 1999;Aubie et al, 2009). Another proposes that slowly changing ionic conductances, induced solely by sustained hyperpolarization (i.e., sustained inhibition), result in duration-dependent currents and duration-selective responses (Hooper et al, 2002).…”
Section: Conceptual Mechanisms Of Duration Tuningmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Some are circuit-based models that rely on the temporal interaction and integration of excitatory and inhibitory synaptic inputs at the DTN (Casseday et al, , 2000Fuzessery and Hall, 1999;Aubie et al, 2009). Another proposes that slowly changing ionic conductances, induced solely by sustained hyperpolarization (i.e., sustained inhibition), result in duration-dependent currents and duration-selective responses (Hooper et al, 2002).…”
Section: Conceptual Mechanisms Of Duration Tuningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A symmetrical window of coincidence will naturally result in a bandpass duration-tuned response (Fig. 2 A, B); however, the coincidence detection mechanism can also produce short-pass duration-tuned responses when the excitatory in-puts maximally coincide at the shortest stimulus durations (Aubie et al, 2009). Fuzessery and Hall (1999) noticed that many short-pass DTNs in the IC of the pallid bat had responses locked to stimulus onset rather than stimulus offset, suggesting these neurons lacked an offsetevoked excitatory input.…”
Section: Coincidence Detection Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Long-pass DTNs in the IC require a minimum stimulus duration before spiking, and this minimum duration remains constant or increases with increasing SPL (Faure et al 2003;Aubie et al 2009). Theoretically, stimulus duration could be decoded from the responses of a long-pass DTN, or any neuron with tonic responses, by simply integrating spike counts; however, a neural decoder trying to discriminate between two responses with long spike trains would face a similar problem to a decoder trying to discriminate between two responses with long latencies (e.g., the brain may find it difficult to differentiate between a 24-ms stimulus that evoked 20 spikes and a 25-ms stimulus that evoked 21 spikes).…”
Section: Decoding Stimulus Durationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We measured spike counts and latencies from auditory DTNs in the mammalian IC to characterize the information content of duration-selective neural responses. Previous studies, including those by the authors, have characterized the spiking profile of DTNs by the shape of the duration tuning curve (i.e., short-pass, band-pass, or long-pass) and defined the neuronal best duration (BD) to be the stimulus duration that evoked the peak spike count (Casseday et al 1994(Casseday et al , 2000Ehrlich et al 1997;Faure et al 2003;Aubie et al 2009Aubie et al , 2012Sayegh et al 2011). To test this hypothesis, we measured information content of DTN spiking responses by calculating the stimulus-specific information (SSI) and estimated observed Fisher information (FI).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%