The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2014
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00360.2014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decoding stimulus duration from neural responses in the auditory midbrain

Abstract: (DTNs). Temporal specificity in their spiking suggests that one function of DTNs is to encode stimulus duration; however, the efficacy of duration encoding by DTNs has yet to be investigated. Herein, we characterize the information content of individual cells and a population of DTNs from the mammalian inferior colliculus (IC) by measuring the stimulus-specific information (SSI) and estimated Fisher information (FI) of spike count responses. We found that SSI was typically greatest for those stimulus durations… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Behaviorally, sound offsets are an important cue for sound-duration encoding. Neurons in the auditory midbrain that are sensitive to sound duration act as coincidence detectors that only fire action potentials if excitatory postsynaptic responses evoked by the onset of sound temporally coincide with excitatory postsynaptic responses evoked by the offset of sound (Casseday et al, 1994; Aubie et al, 2009, 2012, 2014; Sayegh et al, 2011; ). Duration sensitive neurons have been classified according to their ability to preferably encode sounds of different durations and are referred to as short-pass, bandpass and long-pass duration tuned neurons.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Behaviorally, sound offsets are an important cue for sound-duration encoding. Neurons in the auditory midbrain that are sensitive to sound duration act as coincidence detectors that only fire action potentials if excitatory postsynaptic responses evoked by the onset of sound temporally coincide with excitatory postsynaptic responses evoked by the offset of sound (Casseday et al, 1994; Aubie et al, 2009, 2012, 2014; Sayegh et al, 2011; ). Duration sensitive neurons have been classified according to their ability to preferably encode sounds of different durations and are referred to as short-pass, bandpass and long-pass duration tuned neurons.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Aubie et al (2014) decoded spike counts recorded from bat midbrain neurons responding to tones with durations ranging from 1 to 25 ms. The much longer tone durations we presented (50 -400 ms) are the inverses of the range of modulation frequencies essential for speech signals (2.5-20 Hz) and known to be robustly represented by cortical neurons in this species ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neurons exhibiting duration-selective responses have been characterized in multiple vertebrate species (Aubie et al 2012;Sayegh et al 2011), chiefly frogs (Gooler and Feng 1992;Hall and Feng 1986;Narins and Capranica 1980;Potter 1965;Rose 2014) and bats (Aubie et al 2014;Casseday et al 1994;Ehrlich et al 1997;Faure et al 2003;Fuzessery 1994; Fuzessery and Hall 1999; Galazyuk and Feng 1997; Macías et al . Contextual modulation of cortical responses permits the discrimination of tone duration from the "spontaneous" rates and onset responses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the neural resolution measure we developed here is sensitive to the noise inherent in trial-to-trial variability of discharges, it contributes nothing to our understanding of such informational redundancy in neural population codes. Furthermore, there are other measures which are in widespread use in central auditory physiology which quantify neural coding in the light of response variability, such as Shannon information [ 6 , 17 , 37 , 38 ] or Fisher information [ 39 , 40 ]. So why, or when, is the use of a neural resolution estimate through kernel-smoothing of the type developed here more appropriate than the use of alternative, already well established methods for the quantification of neural tuning or coding?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%