Computational Geometry for Modeling Neural Populations: from Visualization to Simulation

Abstract

The importance of a mesoscopic description level of the brain has now been well established. Rate based models are widely used, but have limitations. Recently, several extremely efficient population-level methods have been proposed that go beyond the characterization of a population in terms of a single variable. Here, we present a method for simulating neural populations based on two dimensional (2D) point spiking neuron models that defines the state of the population in terms of a density function over the neural state space. Our method differs in that we do not make the diffusion approximation, nor do we reduce the state space to a single dimension (1D). We do not hard code the neural model, but read in a grid describing its state space in the relevant simulation region. Novel models can be studied without even recompiling the code. The method is highly modular: variations of the deterministic neural dynamics and the stochastic process can be investigated independently. Currently, there is a trend to reduce complex high dimensional neuron models to 2D ones as they offer a rich dynamical repertoire that is not available in 1D, such as limit cycles. We will demonstrate that our method is ideally suited to investigate noise in such systems, replicating results obtained in the diffusion limit and generalizing them to a regime of large jumps. The joint probability density function is much more informative than 1D marginals, and we will argue that the study of 2D systems subject to noise is important complementary to 1D systems. Author SummaryA group of slow, noisy and unreliable cells collectively implement our mental faculties, and how they do this is still one of the big scientific questions of our time. Mechanistic explanations of our cognitive skills, be it locomotion, object handling, language comprehension or thinking in general -whatever that may be -is still far off. A few years ago the following question was posed: Imagine that aliens would provide us with a brain-sized clump of matter, with complete freedom to sculpt realistic neuronal networks with arbitrary precision. Would we be able to build a brain? The answer appears to be no, because this technology is actually materializing, not in the form of an alien kick-start, but through steady progress in computing power, simulation 1/38 methods and the emergence of databases on connectivity, neural cell types, complete with gene expression, etc. A number of groups have created brain-scale simulations, others like the Blue Brain project may not have simulated a full brain, but they included almost every single detail known about the neurons they modelled. And yet, we do not know how we reach for a glass of milk.Mechanistic, large-scale models require simulations that bridge multiple scales. Here 1 we present a method that allows the study of two dimensional dynamical systems 2 subject to noise, with very little restrictions on the dynamical system or the nature of 3 the noise process. Given that high dimensional realistic models of neurons have been 4 reduce...

Hybrid Scheme for Modeling Local Field Potentials from Point-Neuron Networks

“…Despite their simplicity, point-neuron-network models explain a variety of salient features of neural activity observed in vivo, such as spike-train irregularity ( Softky and Koch 1993 ; van Vreeswijk and Sompolinsky 1996 ; Amit and Brunel 1997 ; Shadlen and Newsome 1998 ), membrane-potential fluctuations ( Destexhe and Paré 1999 ), asynchronous firing ( Ecker et al 2010 ; Renart et al 2010 ; Ostojic 2014 ), correlations in neural activity ( Gentet et al 2010 ; Okun and Lampl 2008 ; Helias et al 2013 ), self-sustained activity ( Ohbayashi et al 2003 ; Kriener et al 2014 ), and realistic firing rates across laminar cortical populations ( Potjans and Diesmann 2014 ). Point-neuron networks are amenable to mathematical analysis (see, e.g., Brunel 2000 ; Deco et al 2008 ; Tetzlaff et al 2012 ; Helias et al 2013 ; de Kamps 2013 ; Schuecker et al 2015 ; Bos et al 2016 ) and can be efficiently evaluated numerically ( Brette et al 2007 ; Plesser et al 2007 ; Helias et al 2012 ; Kunkel et al 2014 ). The mechanisms governing networks of biophysically detailed multicompartment model neurons, in contrast, are less accessible to analysis and these models are more prone to overfitting.…”

Digital comic learning media based on character values on students’ critical thinking in solving mathematical problems in terms of learning styles

“…When learning geometry, students need to master the concepts to apply their geometric skills, such as visualizing and recognizing various types of shapes and spaces, describing images, making sketches, labeling certain points, and recognizing the differences and similarities between geometrical shapes (Ayuningrum, 2017;Kamps et al, 2018;Fauzi & Arisetyawan, 2020). However, students' can hardly master and implement the material because the teacher uses teaching methods and asks questions when delivering material (Ramadhan et al, 2021;Utami et al, 2019).…”

Mind the last spike — firing rate models for mesoscopic populations of spiking neurons

“…Accounting for additional variables such as gating variables, adaptation, threshold and synaptic variables as well as dendritic compartments is principally possible by considering a multi-dimensional state space. Although efficient numerical methods [34,40] and analytical approaches [41][42][43] have been proposed for two-dimensional population density equations, solutions on a multidimensional state space are generally inefficient and mathematically intractable. Here, we follow a different approach, called refractory density method (RDM) [30,[44][45][46][47].…”