2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jiec.2012.02.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational fluid dynamics studies of dry and wet pressure drops in structured packings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where C 1e = 1.44, C 2e = 1.92, C m = 0.09, s k = 1, and s e = 0.77 [34]. Another popular two-equation model is the low-Reynolds standard k-w model proposed by Wilcox [46].…”
Section: Numerical Simulation 41 Governing Equations and Numerical Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where C 1e = 1.44, C 2e = 1.92, C m = 0.09, s k = 1, and s e = 0.77 [34]. Another popular two-equation model is the low-Reynolds standard k-w model proposed by Wilcox [46].…”
Section: Numerical Simulation 41 Governing Equations and Numerical Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, they employed k-e, k-w, renormalization group (RNG) k-e, and BSL turbulence models with Reynolds numbers between 200 and 1900. Recently, Hosseini et al applied CFD simulation to study the hydrodynamics [34] and evaluated the effective area [35] of two structured packings known as Gempak 2A and Sulzer BX. Two-and three-dimensional numerical studies were carried out and the results showed that the k-w model provided a satisfactory trend to analyze the flow through structured packings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The work presents velocity and concentration fields in a criss-cross section of Mellapak 350.Y. Hosseini et al (2012) Micro-scale CFD Two-dimensional VOF simulation. The validity of the correlations between dry and wet pressure drops is checked.…”
Section: Computational Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Worldwide, structured packing has equipped approximately 25% of all the refinery vacuum towers (Brunazzin and Paglianti 1997). Compared to the traditional trays and random packings, they feature moderately high surface area and void fraction that lead to the improvement of mass transfer performance and capacity of the columns with relatively low-pressure drop (Hosseini et al 2012). Other advantages of structured packings compared with the conventional dumped packings are higher separation efficiency, better radial mixing, lower pressure drop and higher capacity.…”
Section: Packed Bed Columnsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the aforementioned disadvantages of structured packings, it is necessary to increase the separation efficiency and decrease capital cost in order to obtain a suitable design of these columns (Hosseini et al 2012). Hence, various studies to increase the columns efficiency have been done.…”
Section: Packed Bed Columnsmentioning
confidence: 99%