2000
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-45257-7_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational Complexity of Problems on Probabilistic Grammars and Transducers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0
3

Year Published

2000
2000
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
45
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The problem of finding the most probable string is discussed by Paz (1971), Casacuberta and de la Higuera (2000), Sima'an (2002) and Blondel and Canterini (2003).…”
Section: Further Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem of finding the most probable string is discussed by Paz (1971), Casacuberta and de la Higuera (2000), Sima'an (2002) and Blondel and Canterini (2003).…”
Section: Further Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The search of the optimal y in (5) using definition (3) is a difficult computational problem (Casacuberta & de la Higuera, 2000). The only possible algorithmic solution is the use of some variant of the A algorithm (e.g., the Stack-Decoding (Bahl, Jelinek & Mercer, 1983)), which presents exponential computational costs in the worst case and, therefore, may not be feasible for use in some real applications.…”
Section: Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Translation models, such as the phrase-based translation model that we focus on in this paper (Koehn et al, 2003), define multiple derivations for each translation, making the probability of a translation the sum over all of its derivations. Unfortunately, finding the maximum probability translation is NP-hard for this model (Casacuberta and Higuera, 2000), making approximations necessary. The most common of these approximations is the Viterbi approximation, which can be computed in polynomial time via dynamic programming (DP).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%