2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11082-021-03186-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational analysis of chalcogenides as an inorganic hole transport layer in perovskite solar cells

Abstract: Fill factor (FF) de cit and stability is a primary concern with the perovskite solar cell. Resistance values and band alignment at junction interface in perovskite are causing low ll factor. Moisture sensitivity of methylammonium lead halide perovskite is causing a stability issue. We tried to solve these issues by using inorganic hole transport layer (HTL). FF is sensitive to the band offset values. We study the band alignment/band offset effect at the Perovskite /HTL junction. Inorganic material replacing Sp… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We utilized a solar cell capacitance simulator (SCAPS 1D), a Poisson solver, to solve these photovoltaic equations under diverse electrostatic potential, recombination, and tunneling conditions for our desired material system and device configuration. [21][22][23][24][25] The device configuration of spiroOMeTAD/CsSn 0.5 Ge 0.5 I 3 /TiO 2 /FTO is simulated by taking the material parameters from the literature and is comprehensively summarized in Table 1. Our device and results can be reproduced using the parameters from Table 1.…”
Section: Simulation Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We utilized a solar cell capacitance simulator (SCAPS 1D), a Poisson solver, to solve these photovoltaic equations under diverse electrostatic potential, recombination, and tunneling conditions for our desired material system and device configuration. [21][22][23][24][25] The device configuration of spiroOMeTAD/CsSn 0.5 Ge 0.5 I 3 /TiO 2 /FTO is simulated by taking the material parameters from the literature and is comprehensively summarized in Table 1. Our device and results can be reproduced using the parameters from Table 1.…”
Section: Simulation Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analogous to the case of CBO, in negativeVBO conditions, a cliff structure is formed. [ 40 ] The activation energy ( E a ) for charge carrier recombination becomes lesser than E gabs . E a is governed by the following expression Ea=Egabs|VBO|$$\textrm{ } E_{\text{a}} = E_{\text{gabs}} - \cdot \text{VBO} \cdot$$…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…across heterojunctions’ optoelectrical solar cell device using appropriate conditions, defect models, script files, recorder setup, etc. [ 49–58 ] It is a Poisson–Schrodinger solver in one dimension which iteratively solves coupled electrostatic Poisson's and continuity equations, drift‐diffusion equation and generation–recombination profiles, using the Gummel iteration method with Newton–Ralphson substeps alongside the length of the device, at the junction under various illumination and biasing conditions. Applying relevant boundary conditions at the interfaces and different contacts, SCAPS solves the coupled differential equations in (Ψ, n , p ) or (Ψ, E Fn , E Fp ).Jnormaln=μnormalnnqdEFndxJnormalp=μnormalppqdEFpdxdJnormalndxUnormaln+G=dndtdJnormalpdxUnormalp+G=dpdtddx(ε0εnormalrdx)=q(pn+NnormalD+NnormalA+ρdefq)where Ψ is the electrostatic potential, ε 0 and ε r is the permittivity of vacuum and semiconductor, n and p are the respective carrier densities, N D + are N...…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48] setup, etc. [49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58] It is a Poisson-Schrodinger solver in one dimension which iteratively solves coupled electrostatic Poisson's and continuity equations, drift-diffusion equation and generationrecombination profiles, using the Gummel iteration method with Newton-Ralphson substeps alongside the length of the device, at the junction under various illumination and biasing conditions. Applying relevant boundary conditions at the interfaces and different contacts, SCAPS solves the coupled differential equations in (Ψ, n, p) or (Ψ, E Fn , E Fp ).…”
Section: Simulation Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation