2014
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2420039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compulsory Acquisition Without Compensation and the Land Use Act

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Globally, the indemnity theory is the predominant principle underlying expropriation and compensation legislation (Ambaye, 2009). Compensation assessed based on principles such as fair compensation, adequate compensation, full indemnification or just compensation subscribes to the tenets of owner's loss theory (Otubu, 2012;Denyer-Green, 2014). Contrary to this, taker's gain theory is founded on the principle that the acquiring entity must only compensate for compulsorily acquired land (Kabanga and Mooya, 2018).…”
Section: Literature Review 21 Compensation Theories and Compulsory Ac...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Globally, the indemnity theory is the predominant principle underlying expropriation and compensation legislation (Ambaye, 2009). Compensation assessed based on principles such as fair compensation, adequate compensation, full indemnification or just compensation subscribes to the tenets of owner's loss theory (Otubu, 2012;Denyer-Green, 2014). Contrary to this, taker's gain theory is founded on the principle that the acquiring entity must only compensate for compulsorily acquired land (Kabanga and Mooya, 2018).…”
Section: Literature Review 21 Compensation Theories and Compulsory Ac...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, Zhang and Lu (2011) explained compulsory land acquisition as government act of transferring ownership in land from private to state owned where the interest of the public is involved. Furthermore, Otubu (2013) explained it to be government's authority to acquire rights in land without the owner's consent for the benefit of the community. Michelman (1967) explained the justification for compulsory land acquisition to be development of various projects that will benefit the public.…”
Section: Theoretical Perspectives Of Compulsory Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Michelman (1967) explained the justification for compulsory land acquisition to be development of various projects that will benefit the public. Otubu (2013) further explained that without the government's authority to compulsorily acquire private property for public purpose, performance of many desirable projects that will benefit the public will be undermined or frustrated by various holdouts. The LUA recognizes compulsory acquisition as revocation of right of rights of occupancy.…”
Section: Theoretical Perspectives Of Compulsory Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Land speculations, land grabbing and expropriation without adequate compensation are the major constraints to land availability. Ambiguities are inherent in the LUA; as a consequence, many have called for its review [105][106][107][108][109][110].…”
Section: Justification For Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%