1972
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.5.1384
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compton Scattering and Fixed Poles in Parton Field-Theoretic Models

Abstract: We extend a class of parton models to a fully gauge invariant theory for the full Compton amplitude.The existence of local electromagnetic interactions is shown to always give rise to a constant real part in the high energy behavior of the amplitude TI(v ,q'). In the language of Reggeisation this is interpreted as a fixed pole at J = 0 in Tl and v T2, with residue polynomial in the photon mass squared.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
108
0

Year Published

1972
1972
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
108
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the theoretical side studies in the partonic [127,128] or light-cone [129,130] approach lead to a real term in the transversal part of the (forward) Compton amplitude that in the language of Reggeization was interpreted as a J = 0 fixed pole. Nevertheless, via a subtracted sum rule [131,132,127,128] it is related to the imaginary part of the Compton amplitude. This would imply that there is no separate D-term contribution in the central GPD region.…”
Section: Discussing the Subtraction Constantmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the theoretical side studies in the partonic [127,128] or light-cone [129,130] approach lead to a real term in the transversal part of the (forward) Compton amplitude that in the language of Reggeization was interpreted as a J = 0 fixed pole. Nevertheless, via a subtracted sum rule [131,132,127,128] it is related to the imaginary part of the Compton amplitude. This would imply that there is no separate D-term contribution in the central GPD region.…”
Section: Discussing the Subtraction Constantmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is already apparent that any divergence of S must arise from the q 2 -+ -00 limit. There is good reason to believe that such singularities are fixed [5,14,15,16](i. e., they occur at J=a! (t) where o(t)=0 for all t) and have residues which are polynomial in q2 for amplitudes free of kinematic singularities [5,15].…”
Section: Derivation Of the Schwinger Term Sum Rule From The Bjl Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3) becomes: gi ALL qOqi(tL(q2, ') + t2(q2, '))= --' + O ~ + qip(S2, ') 90 \ 1 40 (5) where P(q2, v ) is some polynomial in q2 and v , which is to be identified with terms on the right-hand side which do not vanish as q. -im.…”
Section: Derivation Of the Schwinger Term Sum Rule From The Bjl Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…e p can provide a remarkable window to the QCD structure of hadrons at the amplitude level. The interference of the DVCS amplitude and the coherent Bethe-Heitler amplitude leads to an e asymmetry which is related to the real part of the DVCS amplitude [2]. The imaginary part can also be accessed through various spin asymmetries [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%