1973
DOI: 10.1016/0003-4916(73)90481-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the finiteness of scaling sum rules

Abstract: The convergence of sum rules relating the matrix elements of local, operators to integrals over deep-inelastic structure functions is studied critically.It is found that the matrix elements may always be written as the q2 --03 limit of finite expressions, regardless of the (Regge) The treatment is readily applicable to other scaling and fixed q2 sum rules needing regulation. A compendium of these is given.-3-

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

1974
1974
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The connection with the chiral theory allows us to identify, for the first time, a δ-function contribution to the s PDF at x = 0, as well as a valence-like component of the s-quark PDF. This result complements earlier discussions of δ-function contributions in the context of the unpolarized Schwinger term and proton spin sum rules [36,37].…”
supporting
confidence: 88%
“…The connection with the chiral theory allows us to identify, for the first time, a δ-function contribution to the s PDF at x = 0, as well as a valence-like component of the s-quark PDF. This result complements earlier discussions of δ-function contributions in the context of the unpolarized Schwinger term and proton spin sum rules [36,37].…”
supporting
confidence: 88%
“…Besides e(x) and g 2 (x), there is a light-cone sum rule for the tensor charge related to twist-three longitudinally-polarized distribution h L (x), which contains a potential δ(x) [20,21]. In terms of the dispersion relations related to the socalled light-cone current algebra, the existence of the δfunction contributions corresponds to a subtraction constant, called J = 0 fixed pole [23][24][25]. Such contributions exist in general for higher-twist LF observables, and the example of F L (x) considered in the old literature (see also [26]) corresponds to a twist-four distribution.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Suggestions of possible δ-function contributions to PDFs were raised earlier [42,43] in discussions of the unpolarized Schwinger term and proton spin sum rules. The practical implication of the δ-function terms is to provide significantly greater flexibility in the allowed phenomenological parametrization of the s −s difference, suggesting that current forms used in global PDF analysis may be too restrictive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%