2014
DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2013.0212
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compressive strength after blast of sandwich composite materials

Abstract: Composite sandwich materials have yet to be widely adopted in the construction of naval vessels despite their excellent strength-to-weight ratio and low radar return. One barrier to their wider use is our limited understanding of their performance when subjected to air blast. This paper focuses on this problem and specifically the strength remaining after damage caused during an explosion. Carbon-fibre-reinforced polymer (CFRP) composite skins on a styrene–acrylonitrile (SAN) polymer closed-cell foam core are … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(43 reference statements)
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sandwich panel has been sectioned into just 16 parts, to give a purely comparitive estimate of damage suffered between the sandwich panels. The panel has been split such to allow for postblast strength assessments to be performed on the sandwich panels, similar to the research performed by Arora et al [22].…”
Section: Post-blast Damage Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sandwich panel has been sectioned into just 16 parts, to give a purely comparitive estimate of damage suffered between the sandwich panels. The panel has been split such to allow for postblast strength assessments to be performed on the sandwich panels, similar to the research performed by Arora et al [22].…”
Section: Post-blast Damage Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Projectile impact velocities in the range of 15-150 ms -1 are used to delineate the effect of loading rate on the deformation and failure behavior of the structures analyzed. This velocity range corresponds to peak pressures between 15 and 200 MPa, which are comparable to pressures observed in underwater explosions [17][18][19]. The metal platens have a thickness of 10 mm and a diameter of 100 mm; while the foam specimens have a thickness of 50 mm and a diameter of 70 mm Figure 2 A schematic illustration of the dynamic compression "Dynacomp" test setup within the Underwater Shock Loading Simulator (USLS).…”
Section: Instrumented Underwater Impulsive Loading Apparatusmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Additionally, the forces and impulses transmitted by sandwich structures are significantly smaller than those transmitted by monolithic structures [9][10][11]. Recent assessments of blast-loaded marine structures show that fluid structure interaction (FSI) effects play an important role in response and can be exploited to improve the blast mitigation capability [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. The deformation and failure of sandwich structures subjected to underwater impulsive loads is complicated due to competing damage mechanisms, complex failure modes, interfacial effects and material heterogeneity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(kPa) (kPa ms) (kPa ms) (mm) Study c relates to the effect of core thickness and is partially presented in previous publications[20,48].b Additional data from other core thicknesses and blast conditions included for the discussion.c Data acquisition failed during test.d Measured peak shock pressure and impulse is equivalent to the gauge measurement or overpressure.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%