2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2018.04.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compressive deformation mechanism of honeycomb-like graphene aerogels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Upon closer inspection in Figure f,g, it is revealed the nearly paralleled graphene sheets tends to bend to release the externally applied force (wall‐to‐wall contraction or densification) while the bridge term performs out‐of‐plane “buckling” behavior, though both could fully return to their original states (Figure h,i), which agrees well with other reports elsewhere . However, rather than local stress concentration, the rotation was observed at the joint part in Figure j during the compression process, which is different from those reported by Shang et al This behavior is possible because the wall near the joint exhibits gradient thickness distribution as shown in Figure i. Above simulation and in situ micro exploration further demonstrated the superior flexibility of the GA is mainly derived from the rationally hierarchical architecture.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Upon closer inspection in Figure f,g, it is revealed the nearly paralleled graphene sheets tends to bend to release the externally applied force (wall‐to‐wall contraction or densification) while the bridge term performs out‐of‐plane “buckling” behavior, though both could fully return to their original states (Figure h,i), which agrees well with other reports elsewhere . However, rather than local stress concentration, the rotation was observed at the joint part in Figure j during the compression process, which is different from those reported by Shang et al This behavior is possible because the wall near the joint exhibits gradient thickness distribution as shown in Figure i. Above simulation and in situ micro exploration further demonstrated the superior flexibility of the GA is mainly derived from the rationally hierarchical architecture.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The simplified facial-linking pattern unit cell composed of three parts: (1) lamella, (2) bridge, and (3) joint as building blocks to construct the GA as shown in Figure 3d,e. [11] However, rather than local stress concentration, the rotation was observed at the joint part in Figure 3j during the compression process, which is different from those reported by Shang et al [43] This behavior is possible because the wall near the joint exhibits gradient thickness distribution as shown in Figure 2i. [11] However, rather than local stress concentration, the rotation was observed at the joint part in Figure 3j during the compression process, which is different from those reported by Shang et al [43] This behavior is possible because the wall near the joint exhibits gradient thickness distribution as shown in Figure 2i.…”
Section: Mechanical Characterization and Finite Element Analysismentioning
confidence: 58%
“…However, it is possible to bring [17], natural cork [46], and rigid closed-cell polyurethane foam [47]. As discussed above, the ability to accurately model non-monotonic volumetric shrinkage and expansion will be important for the simulation and design of next-generation lattice materials, including ultraporous sponges [26] graphene foams aerogels (e.g [27,28,29,30]) in which elastic recovery from compressive strains of 90% have been reported [31]. Graphene aerogels can also be 3D printed [64] allowing for the creation of highly elastic, deformable, and complex lattices structures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent advances in material science include the development of ceramic nanolattices [24], mycelium-based bio-foams [25], ultraporous sponges [26] graphene foams and aerogels (e.g [27,28,29,30]) some capable of recovering from 90% compression [31]. Furthermore, accurate volumetric formulations are relevant to stroke biomechanics research since blood clot contractions cause large volume changes (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, to our best knowledge, all numerical models of GrFs published in references, no matter the full-atomic models [16,[35][36][37][38], coarse-grained models [28,[39][40][41][42] or finite element one [43], have a fairly idealized assumption that the thickness of constituent graphene sheets is the same throughout GrF systems. For example, all samples using fullatomic models [16,[35][36][37][38] are composed of thinnest 1-layer graphene sheets, while other coarse-grained models [28,[39][40][41][42] or finite element one [43] are composed of sheets with 1-layer or multi-layer single thickness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%