2005
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0899-1561(2005)17:1(107)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compression Behavior and Failure Mechanisms of Concrete Masonry Prisms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to better understand the behaviour of tested masonry prisms secant elastic modulus and compressive fracture energy were calculated for all specimens. In Table 2 a Similarly to results available in literature (Page and Shrive, 1988;Cunha et al, 2001, Steil et al, 2001, Köksal et al, 2005, it is seen that the mortar had a small influence in the compressive strength of the masonry prisms, even if it is seen that a trend for the decrease of the compressive strength of mortar result in decrease on the compressive strength of masonry prisms. However, the increase of about 250% on the compressive strength of mortar leads to an increase on compressive strength of about 35% for both unfilled and filled masonry prisms.…”
Section: Behaviour Of Masonry In Terms Of Strength and Vertical Deforsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…In order to better understand the behaviour of tested masonry prisms secant elastic modulus and compressive fracture energy were calculated for all specimens. In Table 2 a Similarly to results available in literature (Page and Shrive, 1988;Cunha et al, 2001, Steil et al, 2001, Köksal et al, 2005, it is seen that the mortar had a small influence in the compressive strength of the masonry prisms, even if it is seen that a trend for the decrease of the compressive strength of mortar result in decrease on the compressive strength of masonry prisms. However, the increase of about 250% on the compressive strength of mortar leads to an increase on compressive strength of about 35% for both unfilled and filled masonry prisms.…”
Section: Behaviour Of Masonry In Terms Of Strength and Vertical Deforsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Only a few numerical researches have been carried out with respect to the strength prediction of hollow concrete block masonry (e.g., Page and Shrive 1990;SayedAhmed and Shrive 1996;Koksal et al 2005) and, even if grouted masonry is usually considered, the material properties are not always fully available from testing and it is not always demonstrated that the ultimate load is the true one, and not the result of divergence of the numerical solution procedure. In this research program, the numerical analysis is based on continuum finite elements utilizing a commercial non-linear finite element code DIANA (DIANA 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Detailed micro-modeling should describe the masonry, mortar, and the interaction behavior between them [22,[36][37][38]. Köksal et al [1,8,9] have performed FE analysis of masonry prisms and columns strengthened with FRP describing the constitutive behavior of the unit, mortar, and FRP separately. The similar approach has been adopted for the FE modeling of masonry shear walls while making the assumption that the material description of the mortar includes the effect of the unit-mortar interface behavior.…”
Section: The Mechanics Of Constitutive Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large literature has grown up which extends analytical and numerical models applied to masonry structures. These models involve mechanical parameters that are difficult to measure and cannot be implemented practically into numerical analyses [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. Researchers related to detailed micro-, simplified micro-and macro-FE modeling of masonry walls subjected to compression and shear have initially taken similar steps in the modeling process for masonry prisms and columns under concentric loading.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation