2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.addma.2021.101842
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compression behavior and energy absorption of 3D printed continuous fiber reinforced composite honeycomb structures with shape memory effects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The samples were compressed at a quasi-static axial loading speed rate at 1.5 mm/min. To exclude the influence of the build printing orientation on the mechanical responses, all samples were loaded in the perpendicular upright direction with printing orientation (Bai et al, 2020;Hossain et al, 2021;Zeng et al, 2021). The samples were compressed just enough until yielding occurrence can be discerned graphically in stress-strain plots during the compression test.…”
Section: Compression Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The samples were compressed at a quasi-static axial loading speed rate at 1.5 mm/min. To exclude the influence of the build printing orientation on the mechanical responses, all samples were loaded in the perpendicular upright direction with printing orientation (Bai et al, 2020;Hossain et al, 2021;Zeng et al, 2021). The samples were compressed just enough until yielding occurrence can be discerned graphically in stress-strain plots during the compression test.…”
Section: Compression Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To test the accuracy of theoretical predictions, identical samples were consequently produced using PolyJet technology from Vero PureWhite polymer and two independent laser powder bed fusion systems from stainless steel 316L and Ti6Al4V titanium alloy. Previous studies dealing with honeycomb structure tested the lattice by compression [ 7 , 8 , 9 ], bending [ 10 ], or rely on theoretical analysis only [ 11 ]. Within the presented study, the mechanical properties of the honeycomb structure were predicted using the analytical and the numerical model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accuracy of predictions was verified by experimental results using three different materials in the tensile test. The tensile test is more appropriate for additively manufactured materials as it can identify defects of materials due to lack of fusion, keyhole collapse, or gas porosity more effectively than compression tests [ 7 ]. In a compression test, material defects may close up and do not have a significant impact on behavior under compression modes of loading [ 12 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was shown that hexagonal structures overlapped and square structures were broken. Each structure, under the influence of temperature (70°C), returned to the state before the compression test [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%