Proceedings 2000 International Conference on Image Processing (Cat. No.00CH37101)
DOI: 10.1109/icip.2000.901134
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compressed domain MPEG-2 video editing with VBV requirement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this paper, video buffer verifier (VBV) requirements are not taken into account, because the probability that a bitstream concatenated with segments does not meet the VBV requirements can be decreased by overlapped segment transcoding. In order to strictly guarantee the requirements, efficient methods for compressed domain video editing as proposed in [12] should be applied .…”
Section: System Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, video buffer verifier (VBV) requirements are not taken into account, because the probability that a bitstream concatenated with segments does not meet the VBV requirements can be decreased by overlapped segment transcoding. In order to strictly guarantee the requirements, efficient methods for compressed domain video editing as proposed in [12] should be applied .…”
Section: System Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another editing approach is compressed domain editing technique. For example, [1] proposes a method to concatenate MPEG segments while maintaining VBV condition. Picture-type conversion method in compressed domain for MPEG content trimming at arbitrary frame is explained in [2].…”
Section: Review Of Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%