Comprehensive Risk Assessment of Health-Related Hazardous Events in the Drinking Water Supply System from Source to Tap in Gaza Strip, Palestine

Abstract

Background. The traditional approach in the management of the quality drinking water, and relying on end-product testing, has proven ineffective in protecting public health. Therefore, the transition to a systematic approach in drinking water supply systems management from the source to the consumer tap was taken as a water safety plan (WSP). Objective. The study aims to investigate the health-related hazardous events in order to decide on the best risk-reduction strategies in the supply of drinking water in the Gaza strip. Methods. A semiquantitative matrix method for risk assessment was applied. Also, chlorine residual, electrical conductivity, and nitrate concentration further tested in 109 water wells, 109 small-scale water desalination plants, 197 tanker trucks, and 384 households distributed over five governorates of the Gaza strip. Results. The mean of the measured chlorine residual values was less than the recommended national and international limits (0.2–1 mg/liter). The mean of electrical conductivity at catchment points and household municipal water taps was 2165.1 μS·cm−1 and 2000 μS·cm−1, respectively. Furthermore, zero percent of water samples met the recommended criteria, indicating that the groundwater in the Gaza strip is nonpotable. Only 12.8% and 8.8% of water samples met the permissible levels at catchment areas and municipal water at household, respectively, indicating sever health impacts on the public. Moreover, the most hazardous events were related to high levels of groundwater salinity, the low level of disinfection, the effect of electricity outages on the efficiency of the desalination process, and leakage of water from the tanker truck tank reservoirs. Therefore, urgent interventions are required to improve the quality of water and to mitigate the possible health effects. Conclusion. The prioritization of hazardous events that are proportional to the degree of their attributed risk could help guide in making the right risk-reduction decisions. Urgent interventions are required to improve the quality of water and to mitigate the possible health effects.

Impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic on the Palestinian family: A cross-sectional study

“…Water and electricity shortages are common in Palestine and pre-COVID-19; it has been documented repeatedly how water and electrical power supplies were inadequate to meet Palestinian household’s needs, particularly in the Gaza Strip. 16 – 19 These shortages worsened current COVID-19 as most electrical engines need fuel, which was not possible due to fuel import restrictions, which also affected water pumps. Interestingly, the majority of the population uses mobile Internet bands or 12 V stable power supply for wifi router, making wifi much more accessible than potable water or electricity.…”

“…Abuzerr and his colleagues reported that water and electrical power supplies were inadequate to meet the Palestinian family’s demand. 16 – 19 …”

The Association between Changes in Coronary Artery Calcium Scores, Dietary Intake, Physical Activity, and Depression Symptoms among the Population of Gaza Strip, Palestine

“…The study was conducted at Al-Shifa medical complex which is located in the Gaza Strip, a setting suffering prolonged crises and experiencing persistent humanitarian situations. Difficulty accessing care, scarcities in resources, medications, insufficient health facilities, and staff capacity, tremendously challenging living circumstances, a disjointed healthcare system, and snowballing chronic diseases influence the health of people in the Gaza Strip (24)(25)(26)(27).…”

Assessment of water supply system from catchment to consumers as framed in WHO water safety plans: A study from Maiduguri water treatment plant, North East Nigeria

“…Safe drinking water supply is essential for sustaining good public health in urban residents (WHO, 2004). The traditional method of drinking water supply quality control based on end-pipe monitoring, which relies on final water quality and bacterial indicators, is inefficient and uneconomic in protecting public health by water supply systems (Abuzerr et al, 2020;Jose, 2005), as a result, the World Health Organisation (WHO) encouraged and recommended water safety plan (WSP) based on risk assessment and risk management from catchment to consumers, which states that; "The most effective means of securing the safety of a drinking water supply is through the use of a comprehensive risk assessment and risk management approach that encompasses all steps in the water supply from catchment to consumers (Figure 1), such approaches are known as water safety plan" (Bartram et al, 2009;WHO, 2004WHO, , 2011 WSP is simply a documented plan that identifies hazards; assesses risks from catchment to consumers; Prioritizes risks (with focus on highest risks) and Mitigates risks through control measures. This means moving away from reliance on output monitoring (measuring parameters in final water), and moving into input monitoring (measuring parameters which show that the system is working) (Bartram et al, 2009, Emma andPhillips, 2014).…”