2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2018.11.043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comprehensive characterization of pore and throat system for tight sandstone reservoirs and associated permeability determination method using SEM, rate-controlled mercury and high pressure mercury

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, the intersect point of the two measurements was applied in this research as the connection point. As shown in Figure 7, the two sets of measurements of pore diameter distribution were plotted in the same figure, in which the intersection point was automatically determined as the connection point (Gao et al., 2019). Both measurements were truncated at the connection point and then the smaller pores from nitrogen adsorption measurements and the larger pores from the mercury invasion measurements are connected as the overall size distribution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hence, the intersect point of the two measurements was applied in this research as the connection point. As shown in Figure 7, the two sets of measurements of pore diameter distribution were plotted in the same figure, in which the intersection point was automatically determined as the connection point (Gao et al., 2019). Both measurements were truncated at the connection point and then the smaller pores from nitrogen adsorption measurements and the larger pores from the mercury invasion measurements are connected as the overall size distribution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MIP can be used to measure the pore throat radius quickly, pore throat distribution and other pore throat parameters, in which the measurement is more accurate with the higher mercury injection pressure. However, it is difficult to measure the micro-pore information due to the limited mercury injection pressure under laboratory conditions (Gao et al., 2019; Juliao et al., 2015; Wang et al., 2019). The LP-N 2 A technique can provide more particulars of the specific surface area and pore size of micro-pores, but the potential measurement errors from LP-N 2 A may also be magnified once the macro-pores are developed in the shale (Juliao et al., 2015; Wang et al., 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, parameters including pore size, geometry and connectivity are quantified to characterize pore network structures of tight reservoirs, which can be obtained by using direct and indirect 2 of 20 techniques, such as thin section, MICP, SEM, NMR and X-ray computed tomography (X-ray µ-CT). Gao et al (2019) used SEM, rate-controlled mercury and high-pressure mercury to characterize the pore and throat system of tight sandstone reservoirs, and predicted the permeability of tight reservoirs [12]. Xiao et al (2017) combined SEM, rate-controlled mercury and NMR to investigate the pore throat structures and their evolutions [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The type and size of pores and cracks can be observed at various scales by means of preparation and identification of rock casting thin section, multiscale computed tomography (CT), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), field emission SEM (FESEM), and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) [9][10][11][12]. Gas adsorption, mercury porosimetry, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), and small-angle neutron scattering (SANS) can be used to quantitatively characterize the distribution range and frequency of pores and cracks [13,14]. The identification technology of rock casting thin section allows us to judge the mineral composition and pore distribution of rocks by means of microscopy, which is mainly used to observe the overall structure of rock surface and larger cracks or pores.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%