2020
DOI: 10.1080/20473869.2020.1827673
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comprehensive attention training system (CATS): A computerized executive-functioning training for school-aged children with autism spectrum disorder

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another qualitative feature that can influence the results and generate questionable interpretations of efficacy is the blinding of participants and outcome assessors, which can be partly remedied by the use of non-subjective instruments and allocation concealment in randomised trials. Of the three cases with the highest risk of bias, two studies did not include enough information about the blinding of the evaluators [85,86], and one study in which the trainer of the intervention coincides with the evaluator of the outcome measures [87]. Overall, in five studies, the authors report the non-blindness of the assessors [67,[87][88][89][90] and in ten studies being unclear in their reporting.…”
Section: Results Of the Searchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Another qualitative feature that can influence the results and generate questionable interpretations of efficacy is the blinding of participants and outcome assessors, which can be partly remedied by the use of non-subjective instruments and allocation concealment in randomised trials. Of the three cases with the highest risk of bias, two studies did not include enough information about the blinding of the evaluators [85,86], and one study in which the trainer of the intervention coincides with the evaluator of the outcome measures [87]. Overall, in five studies, the authors report the non-blindness of the assessors [67,[87][88][89][90] and in ten studies being unclear in their reporting.…”
Section: Results Of the Searchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the three cases with the highest risk of bias, two studies did not include enough information about the blinding of the evaluators [85,86], and one study in which the trainer of the intervention coincides with the evaluator of the outcome measures [87]. Overall, in five studies, the authors report the non-blindness of the assessors [67,[87][88][89][90] and in ten studies being unclear in their reporting.…”
Section: Results Of the Searchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations