Despite the computing power of emerging technologies, predicting
Background and SignificanceRNA secondary structure prediction can provide insights in the reconstruction of 3D RNA structures and their functionality. Study of RNA secondary structures is a field that is raising the attention of the scientific community; new insights in the field point out the need for supporting experimental research with computational results. The latter can help to narrow down the space of the experiments and therefore the cost to obtain results.
Figure 1. Time and memory usage by Pknots-RE for PseudoBase sequences with different lengthsDespite the computing power of supercomputers and emerging advanced technologies, e.g., multi-core architectures, the prediction of secondary structures for long RNA using thermodynamics-based methods e.g., Zuker and Turner [14], is still infeasible, especially if the structures include complex secondary structures such as pseudoknots. The space and time required for accurate predictions of pseudoknots based on free energy minimization algorithms grow very rapidly with the sequence length. Figure 1 shows the time and memory (in logarithmic scale) allocated for the prediction of RNA pseudoknots with various lengths using one of the most accurate prediction programs, Pknots-RE [11]. The algorithm underlying Pknots-RE has a run time and memory demand in the order of n 6 and n 4 re-