1989
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1989.tb04678.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compound allergy to a skin marker for patch testing: a chromatographic analysis

Abstract: We present details of a patient who was demonstrated to have contact allergy to a solution used to mark sites of application of patch tests, during investigation of allergy to gold and nickel. Negative results were obtained when patch testing was performed using the individual constituents of the marker solution (gentian violet, dihydroxyacetone and acetone). Chromatographic analysis of various combinations of these chemicals did not identify a chemical derivative which might have caused this reaction.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The manufacturer of the permanent markers emphasizes that Edding 3000 products are not legally registered for marking the skin. Contact reactions to other components of markers have been described (1, 2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The manufacturer of the permanent markers emphasizes that Edding 3000 products are not legally registered for marking the skin. Contact reactions to other components of markers have been described (1, 2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The studies reviewed above show the formation of a new reaction product as the compound allergen. Cox et al (8) refute the suggestion that the compound allergies they report could be the result of a greater absorption of an allergen than their patch test model. They used a dose 12X that in the original preparation and obtained negative patch test results.…”
Section: Compound Allergy and Patch Testingmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…For example, Cox et a!. (8) rule out the possibility of irritant contact derma-titis from gentian violet dye (used in patch testing as a skin marker), as it is known to produce ulcerative lesions when <~;n irritant, and eczematous lesions when an allergen (20). Also, the combined dye containing the gentian violet had been exposed to thousands of their patch test patients as unwitting controls.…”
Section: Irritant or Allergic Contact Dermatitis?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations