2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10123-019-00093-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Composition of bacterial and archaeal communities in the rumen of dromedary camel using cDNA-amplicon sequencing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
8
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Firmicutes were dominated by the family Ruminococcaceae and Lachnospiraceae ( Tables 6 and 7 ), which is in agreement with results obtained by Rabee et al (2020a) . Members of family Ruminococcaceae degrade the hemicellulose, pectin, and cellulose present in the plant cell wall ( Pettipher & Latham, 1979 ), which could explain the high representation of this family in S1 group that fed mixture with high-NDF content and group S3 that fed mixture with high-ADF and NDF contents.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Firmicutes were dominated by the family Ruminococcaceae and Lachnospiraceae ( Tables 6 and 7 ), which is in agreement with results obtained by Rabee et al (2020a) . Members of family Ruminococcaceae degrade the hemicellulose, pectin, and cellulose present in the plant cell wall ( Pettipher & Latham, 1979 ), which could explain the high representation of this family in S1 group that fed mixture with high-NDF content and group S3 that fed mixture with high-ADF and NDF contents.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…At the same time, no available data on the effect of discarded dates and date palm fronds on the rumen microbial populations. The higher ASVs were linked with sheep group fed S3 diet that contains concentrate mixture plus forage, which is similar to findings obtained by Petri et al (2012) and Rabee et al (2020a) . In this study, phylum Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes dominated the bacterial community; this finding was also reported in the rumen of lactating ewes fed olive cake ( Mannelli et al, 2018 ), cattle ( Petri et al, 2013 ), and camel ( Rabee et al, 2020a ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…At the same time, no available data on the effect of discarded dates and date palm fronds on the rumen microbial populations. The higher ASVs were linked with sheep group fed S3 diet that contains concentrate mixture plus forage, which is similar to findings obtained by (Petri et al, 2012;Rabee et al, 2020a). In this study, phylum Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes dominated the bacterial community; this finding was also reported in the rumen of lactating ewes fed olive cake (Mannelli et al, 2018), cattle (Petri et al, 2013), and camel (Rabee et al, 2020a).…”
Section: Diversity and Composition Of Rumen Bacteriasupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The structure of ALNA is highly similar to ileal PPs. In this study, the common dominant bacteria colonized the mucosa surface of the ALNA and ileal PPs were the same as in the intestine of other animals, such as dromedary [20], Bactrian camel [19], cattle [32], sheep [33] and horse [34]. There are several reasons for this phenomenon: first, the similar microenvironment of the intestine, such as the same temperature (maintained at about 37-40˚C) in vivo [35], which provided the foundation for the stable reproduction of microorganisms; second, the similar chyme components, for the herbivores, including large amounts of plant cellulose, fructose, starch granules, etc.…”
Section: The Relationship Between the Host And Common Dominant Bacteriamentioning
confidence: 65%
“…At present, the studies on the bacterial community in the gastrointestinal tract of camels mainly focused on rumen, intestines, and/or feces, and the results suggested that the composition of microbial community in the rumen of a camel was similar to other ruminants with differences in the abundance, meanwhile, there were different metagenomic profiles in different digestive tract regions [19,20]. However, the studies about the different mucosal immune inductive sites of gastrointestinal tract has only received few attentions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%