2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.01.161
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Composites of amorphous and nanocrystalline Zr–Cu–Al–Nb bulk materials synthesized by spark plasma sintering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Zr 48 Cu 36 Al 8 Ag 8 powder was consolidated under argon atmosphere into cylindrical specimens (dimensions: 10 mm diameter and about 10 mm height) by uniaxial hot pressing at different temperatures (743, 753, and 758 K) using an electro-hydraulic universal axial pressing machine (WEBER PWV 30 EDS, Figure 3a,b). We used a pressure of 900 MPa, which represents the upper limit of pressure usable in our hydraulic pressing machine in the temperature range used in this work, and 10 min holding time, which is a good compromise between good densification and minimum crystallization for a series of metallic glass powders, including Ni 52.5 Nb 10 Zr 15 Ti 15 Pt 7.5 [25], Zr 70 Cu 24 Al 4 Nb 2 [26], and Zr 55 Cu 30 Ni 5 Al 10 [27]. A copper coil was used to heat the powders at a heating rate of about 40 K/min.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Zr 48 Cu 36 Al 8 Ag 8 powder was consolidated under argon atmosphere into cylindrical specimens (dimensions: 10 mm diameter and about 10 mm height) by uniaxial hot pressing at different temperatures (743, 753, and 758 K) using an electro-hydraulic universal axial pressing machine (WEBER PWV 30 EDS, Figure 3a,b). We used a pressure of 900 MPa, which represents the upper limit of pressure usable in our hydraulic pressing machine in the temperature range used in this work, and 10 min holding time, which is a good compromise between good densification and minimum crystallization for a series of metallic glass powders, including Ni 52.5 Nb 10 Zr 15 Ti 15 Pt 7.5 [25], Zr 70 Cu 24 Al 4 Nb 2 [26], and Zr 55 Cu 30 Ni 5 Al 10 [27]. A copper coil was used to heat the powders at a heating rate of about 40 K/min.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Powders of Ni 59 Zr 15 Ti 13 Si 3 Sn 2 Nb 7 Al, [121] Fe 75 Nb 3 Si 13 B 9 , [122] Cu 46 Zr 42 Al 7 Y 5 , [123] Zr 55 Cu 30 Al 10 Ni 5 , [124] Zr 70 Cu 24 Al 4 Nb 2 , [125] Ti 45 Zr 10 Cu 31 Pd 10 Sn 4 , [126] Mg 65 Cu 25 Gd 10 , [127] Hf 55 Cu 28 Ni 5 Al 12 , [128] and ZrCu 39.85 Y 2.37 Al 1.8 , [129] among many others, have also been prepared using the SPS technique with varying degrees of success, always optimizing for a temperature between the glass transition and crystallization temperatures, where the powders exhibit lower Vit106 that are normalized with respect to their glass transition temperatures and nose times. Reproduced with permission.…”
Section: Sinteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Powders of Ni 59 Zr 15 Ti 13 Si 3 Sn 2 Nb 7 Al, [ 121 ] Fe 75 Nb 3 Si 13 B 9 , [ 122 ] Cu 46 Zr 42 Al 7 Y 5 , [ 123 ] Zr 55 Cu 30 Al 10 Ni 5 , [ 124 ] Zr 70 Cu 24 Al 4 Nb 2 , [ 125 ] Ti 45 Zr 10 Cu 31 Pd 10 Sn 4 , [ 126 ] Mg 65 Cu 25 Gd 10 , [ 127 ] Hf 55 Cu 28 Ni 5 Al 12 , [ 128 ] and ZrCu 39.85 Y 2.37 Al 1.8 , [ 129 ] among many others, have also been prepared using the SPS technique with varying degrees of success, always optimizing for a temperature between the glass transition and crystallization temperatures, where the powders exhibit lower viscosity. Indeed, the viscosity of the specimens is relevant at all temperatures and impacts sample contraction during the beginning stages of densification by [ 130 ] ΔLLnormalo3γRT24DcQηnormaloexp(QRT)where ΔL/Lnormalo is the change in axial length of the specimen based on ram displacement, γ is the surface energy of the powders, R is the gas constant, T is the temperature, D is the average particle diameter, c is the heating rate, Q is the activation energy for viscous flow, and η o is the pre‐exponential constant inη=ηnormaloexp(QRT)…”
Section: Manufacturing Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The highest hardness of 1341 HV was obtained at the sintering temperature of 550°C. Other researchers have used casting and atomising powder, followed by sintering by the SPS process to produce parts with an amorphous structure for Zr, Cu, Mg and Ti-based alloys [21][22][23][24]. It has been reported that relatively low hardness and poor corrosion resistance of iron-based alloys are factors, which limit their use.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%