The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.08.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Composites based on self-assembled MnAs ferromagnet nanoclusters embedded in ZnSnAs2 semiconductor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(29 reference statements)
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been shown that in the pure as-grown ZnSnAs 2 films the observed μ(T ) and p(T ) dependencies can be satisfactorily explained with the use of the two-band conduction mechanism, taking into account two p-type conduction channels related to holes in the valence band and in the acceptor band [33]. Both μ(T ) and p(T ) dependencies observed for our Zn −x 1 Mn xSnSb 2 samples with ¯> x 0.066 are similar to the results reported for ZnSnAs 2 :MnAs nanocomposite system [29]. Considering those results we believe that in our Zn −x 1 Mn xSnSb 2 samples with ¯> x 0.066 there exists an additional conduction channel or additional type of carriers, associated with MnSb inclusions and having concentrations and mobilities which differ drastically from those in the pure ZnSnSb 2 compound.…”
Section: Magnetotransport Datasupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It has been shown that in the pure as-grown ZnSnAs 2 films the observed μ(T ) and p(T ) dependencies can be satisfactorily explained with the use of the two-band conduction mechanism, taking into account two p-type conduction channels related to holes in the valence band and in the acceptor band [33]. Both μ(T ) and p(T ) dependencies observed for our Zn −x 1 Mn xSnSb 2 samples with ¯> x 0.066 are similar to the results reported for ZnSnAs 2 :MnAs nanocomposite system [29]. Considering those results we believe that in our Zn −x 1 Mn xSnSb 2 samples with ¯> x 0.066 there exists an additional conduction channel or additional type of carriers, associated with MnSb inclusions and having concentrations and mobilities which differ drastically from those in the pure ZnSnSb 2 compound.…”
Section: Magnetotransport Datasupporting
confidence: 84%
“…We observe a large Hall carrier concentration in all studied samples, with values from × 5 10 20 cm −3 for the sample with ¯= x 0.138 up to about × 1.3 10 22 cm −3 for the sample with ¯= x 0.027. Such high hole concentration in semiconductors is usually related to a large defect concentration in the material and was observed in ZnSnSb 2 [28] and other II-IV-V 2 semiconductors such as ZnSnAs 2 [29]. The Hall hole concentration varies with the change in the Mn content of the samples.…”
Section: Magnetotransport Datamentioning
confidence: 94%
“…To their knowledge, this is the only effect that provides a linear positive field dependence. Non-saturating linear positive magnetoresistance (LPMR) due to microscopic conductance fluctuations can appear [14] which in our nanocomposites may be related to cluster agglomerates and the clusters' random deposition.…”
Section: Field-dependent Magnetoresistance Effectsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Standard fabrication methods like molecular beam epitaxy, ion implantation, co-sputtering or pulsed laser deposition have been used to create DMSs out of elemental and multicomponent semiconductors embedding both 3d and 4f elements, e.g., Ge:Mn [8][9][10] and ZnO:Fe [11,12]. Ferromagnetic inclusions are not necessarily composed of the pure ferromagnetic dopant only, but they can also be a ferromagnetic alloy, e.g., ZnSnAs 2 :MnAs [13,14]. In some cases, thermite reactions can also be applied to synthesize DMSs [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The maximum value of the Hall carrier mobility observed for the studied Zn x 1-Cd x GeAs 2 sample with x = 1 is also, to our knowledge, the highest mobility value observed for the CdGeAs 2 compound. The other II-IV-V 2 compounds show relatively low mobility values, for example for CdGeAs 2 not exceeding 200 cm 2 (V • s) −1 [29], for ZnGeAs 2 not exceeding 50 cm 2 (V • s) −1 [28], for ZnSnAs 2 not higher than 200 cm 2 (V • s) −1 [34], and for ZnSnSb 2 not exceeding 40 cm 2 (V • s) −1 [35].…”
Section: Transport and Magnetotransport Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 98%