Abstract:Selon les projections récentes, les effectifs de médecins libéraux diminueront de 30 % d'ici à 2027 et la densité standardisée diminuerait jusqu'en 2023, créant des poches de sous-densité relativement nombreuses sur le territoire français métropolitain. L'article s'intéresse aux ajustements que les médecins généralistes de ville mettent en oeuvre lorsque, sur leur territoire, ils sont d'ores et déjà confrontés à cette raréfaction. Les données utilisées sont celles du troisième panel des médecins généralistes e… Show more
“…Based on the theoretical literature and considering some specifics of the Asalée pilot experiment, such as the heterogeneity in the intensity and nature of cooperation between GP-AN pairs, we consider the following hypotheses concerning the impact of teamwork, skill mixing and cooperation between GPs and ANs: � GPs reallocate any medical time saved due to cooperation with ANs to address unmet healthcare needs, either by providing new care and services to new patients or to patients with chronic diseases or high needs. Indeed, the documentation of adverse consequences on GPs' workloads of the primary healthcare supply shortage and geographic imbalance in France supports this assumption: in underserved areas, quality of care, including for prevention, is lower than that in other areas (Chaput et al, 2020;Silhol, Ventelou, Zaytseva, & Marbot, 2019). On average, visits are shorter and end with less education and counseling, the waiting time between appointments is longer (lower temporal accessibility of GPs), and patients have much more difficulty in registering with a GP gatekeeper or benefiting from unplanned visits when the workload for GPs is very high; � The impact on GPs' activities is larger in underserved areas, where the demand is more constrained; � The impact is larger for GP-AN pairs for which cooperation is effective; � In addition, since we cannot observe the duration of the visit, which may be influenced by the pilot experiment, we assume a constant visit duration over the period to test these hypotheses.…”
Section: Theoretical Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GPs reallocate any medical time saved due to cooperation with ANs to address unmet healthcare needs, either by providing new care and services to new patients or to patients with chronic diseases or high needs. Indeed, the documentation of adverse consequences on GPs' workloads of the primary healthcare supply shortage and geographic imbalance in France supports this assumption: in underserved areas, quality of care, including for prevention, is lower than that in other areas (Chaput et al., 2020; Silhol, Ventelou, Zaytseva, & Marbot, 2019). On average, visits are shorter and end with less education and counseling, the waiting time between appointments is longer (lower temporal accessibility of GPs), and patients have much more difficulty in registering with a GP gatekeeper or benefiting from unplanned visits when the workload for GPs is very high;…”
The integration of primary care organizations and interprofessional cooperation is encouraged in many countries to both improve the productive and allocative efficiency of care provision and address the unequal geographical distribution of general practitioners (GPs). In France, a pilot experiment promoted the vertical integration of and teamwork between GPs and nurses. This pilot experiment relied on the staffing and training of nurses; skill mixing, including the authorization to shift tasks from GPs to nurses; and new remuneration schemes. This article evaluates the overall impact of this pilot experiment over the period 2010-2017 on GP activities based on the following indicators: number of working days, patients seen at least once, patients registered, and visits delivered. We control for endogeneity and reduce selection bias by using a case-control design combining coarsened exact matching and difference-indifferences estimates on panel data. We find a small positive impact on the number of GP working days (þ1.2%) following enrollment and a more pronounced effect on the number of patients seen (þ7.55%) or registered (þ6.87%). However, we find no effect on the number of office and home visits. In this context, cooperation and teamwork between GPs and nurses seem to improve access to care for patients.
“…Based on the theoretical literature and considering some specifics of the Asalée pilot experiment, such as the heterogeneity in the intensity and nature of cooperation between GP-AN pairs, we consider the following hypotheses concerning the impact of teamwork, skill mixing and cooperation between GPs and ANs: � GPs reallocate any medical time saved due to cooperation with ANs to address unmet healthcare needs, either by providing new care and services to new patients or to patients with chronic diseases or high needs. Indeed, the documentation of adverse consequences on GPs' workloads of the primary healthcare supply shortage and geographic imbalance in France supports this assumption: in underserved areas, quality of care, including for prevention, is lower than that in other areas (Chaput et al, 2020;Silhol, Ventelou, Zaytseva, & Marbot, 2019). On average, visits are shorter and end with less education and counseling, the waiting time between appointments is longer (lower temporal accessibility of GPs), and patients have much more difficulty in registering with a GP gatekeeper or benefiting from unplanned visits when the workload for GPs is very high; � The impact on GPs' activities is larger in underserved areas, where the demand is more constrained; � The impact is larger for GP-AN pairs for which cooperation is effective; � In addition, since we cannot observe the duration of the visit, which may be influenced by the pilot experiment, we assume a constant visit duration over the period to test these hypotheses.…”
Section: Theoretical Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GPs reallocate any medical time saved due to cooperation with ANs to address unmet healthcare needs, either by providing new care and services to new patients or to patients with chronic diseases or high needs. Indeed, the documentation of adverse consequences on GPs' workloads of the primary healthcare supply shortage and geographic imbalance in France supports this assumption: in underserved areas, quality of care, including for prevention, is lower than that in other areas (Chaput et al., 2020; Silhol, Ventelou, Zaytseva, & Marbot, 2019). On average, visits are shorter and end with less education and counseling, the waiting time between appointments is longer (lower temporal accessibility of GPs), and patients have much more difficulty in registering with a GP gatekeeper or benefiting from unplanned visits when the workload for GPs is very high;…”
The integration of primary care organizations and interprofessional cooperation is encouraged in many countries to both improve the productive and allocative efficiency of care provision and address the unequal geographical distribution of general practitioners (GPs). In France, a pilot experiment promoted the vertical integration of and teamwork between GPs and nurses. This pilot experiment relied on the staffing and training of nurses; skill mixing, including the authorization to shift tasks from GPs to nurses; and new remuneration schemes. This article evaluates the overall impact of this pilot experiment over the period 2010-2017 on GP activities based on the following indicators: number of working days, patients seen at least once, patients registered, and visits delivered. We control for endogeneity and reduce selection bias by using a case-control design combining coarsened exact matching and difference-indifferences estimates on panel data. We find a small positive impact on the number of GP working days (þ1.2%) following enrollment and a more pronounced effect on the number of patients seen (þ7.55%) or registered (þ6.87%). However, we find no effect on the number of office and home visits. In this context, cooperation and teamwork between GPs and nurses seem to improve access to care for patients.
“…It is therefore vital to better understand how GPs located in relatively underserved areas are adapting their practices. Despite numerous studies comparing healthcare access in rural and urban settings [13][14][15], both in low-and high-income countries, there have been very few comprehensive quantitative studies linking healthcare professional shortages with the quantity and quality of care received by local populations [16][17][18].…”
Disparities in physicians' geographical distribution lead to highly unequal access to healthcare, which may impact quality of care in both high and low-income countries. This paper uses a 2013-2014 nationally representative survey of French general practitioners (GPs) matched with corresponding administrative data to analyze the effects of practicing in an area with weaker medical density. To avoid the endogeneity issue on physicians' choice of the location, we enriched our variable of interest (practicing in a relatively underserved area) with considering changes in medical density between 2007 and 2013, thus isolating GPs who only recently experienced a density decline (identifying assumption). We find that GPs practicing in underserved areas do shorter consultations and tend to substitute time-consuming procedures with alternatives requiring fewer human resources, especially for pain management. Results are robust to considering only GPs newly exposed to low medical density. Findings suggest a significant impact of supply-side shortages on the mix of healthcare services used to treat patients, and point to a plausible increased use of painkillers, opioids in particular.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.