2010
DOI: 10.11606/issn.2316-9079.v9i2p99-108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comportamento territorial e de acasalamento de Phyllomedusa azurea (Anura, Hylidae) em uma lagoa temporária do centro-oeste do Brasil

Abstract: Territorial and mating behavior in Phyllomedusa azurea (Anura: Hylidae) at a temporary pond in west-central Brazil. We studied territorial and mating behavior of Phyllomedusa azurea in the municipality of Cocalzinho de Goiás, Goiás, which is located in central Brazil. During the mating season, male P. azurea engage in territorial behavior that is associated with vocalizations-advertisement, territorial, fight, or a combination of two more of these. When one male frog invades the territory of another, they comm… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
(22 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…obs.). Aggressive behaviors can include both aggressive calls and physical combats (Wogel et al 2002, Costa et al 2010Lemes et al 2012. However, as costs of physical combats can be high, males of B. goiana may be investing more in aggressive calls and, sometimes, adopting a satellite posture, which may be important to decrease energy expenditure and avoid injuries that could be caused by fights (Kluge 1981, Nali andPrado 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…obs.). Aggressive behaviors can include both aggressive calls and physical combats (Wogel et al 2002, Costa et al 2010Lemes et al 2012. However, as costs of physical combats can be high, males of B. goiana may be investing more in aggressive calls and, sometimes, adopting a satellite posture, which may be important to decrease energy expenditure and avoid injuries that could be caused by fights (Kluge 1981, Nali andPrado 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%