1995
DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.68.1.83
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Components and recognition of facial expression in the communication of emotion by actors.

Abstract: This article addresses the issue of the communication of emotion by actors. In Study 1, the facial behavior of 6 actors portraying emotions as felt or unfelt were analyzed with the Facial Action Coding System. Results indicated that the portrayals of felt emotions were closer to the expression of genuine emotion than the portrayals of unfelt emotions for 3 of the 6 emotions under investigation. Study 2 examined the decoding of actors' portrayals from facial behavior. Decoders were found to be very accurate in … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

13
126
2
8

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 138 publications
(150 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
13
126
2
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, brow-to-lid distance is a potent cue for the identification of some facial expressions, such as anger and surprise. Specifically, lowering of the eyebrows and pulling them together is one of the action units that are characteristic of angry expressions (Ekman & Friesen, 1978;Gosselin et al, 1997). The different typical values of brow-to-lid distance in female faces and in angry expressions might easily explain the higher error proportion and slower identification of sex in female angry faces found in the present series of experiments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, brow-to-lid distance is a potent cue for the identification of some facial expressions, such as anger and surprise. Specifically, lowering of the eyebrows and pulling them together is one of the action units that are characteristic of angry expressions (Ekman & Friesen, 1978;Gosselin et al, 1997). The different typical values of brow-to-lid distance in female faces and in angry expressions might easily explain the higher error proportion and slower identification of sex in female angry faces found in the present series of experiments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…In fact, we found significant differences in sex classification only in the case of female faces, with more errors and slower RTs to angry expressions than to happy expressions. Given that browto-lid distance is usually bigger in females, and that angry expressions reduce this distance (Ekman & Friesen, 1978;Gosselin, Kirouac, & Doré, 1997), a straightforward explanation is that angry expressions increased the time needed to classify the sex of female faces. Second, there were, in fact, some suggestions of an influence of expression on sex classification in Atkinson et al's results.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the original prediction concerned lip pressing (AU24) and not lip tightening (Ekman, 2003), these two movements are closely related, because they are both produced by the same muscle, orbicularis oris, and they are both present in the prototypical expression of anger (Ekman et al, 2002b). Previous research also reported associations between lip tightening and expression of anger (Gosselin et al, 1995;Scherer & Ellgring, 2007). Interestingly, Gosselin et al (1995) found lip pressing to be less frequent than lip tightening in anger expressions portrayed by actors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, several authors (e.g. Banse & Scherer, 1996;Galati, Scherer, & Ricci Bitti, 1997;Gosselin, Kirouac, & Doré, 1995;Nusseck et al, 2008;Scherer & Ellgring, 2007) have expressed confidence that, with adequate training, actors manage to produce instances of emotional expressions that are sufficiently stable and realistic. Consequently, in our experiment we adopted a technique of emotion self-induction that has been successfully used in previous studies (Bänziger, Pirker, & Scherer, 2006).…”
Section: Methodological Concernsmentioning
confidence: 99%