2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-32419-7_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complicity in Organizational Deviance: The Role of Internal and External Unethical Pressures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the limitations of these studies is that they have said little about the consequences of this conflict of norms on the members of the organization who are led to carry out such actions on behalf of their company. Yet employees may find it difficult to bridge the gap between their personal norms and those of the organization (Sachet-Milliat, 2005, 2016). This second conflict – between deviant organizational norms and individual norms – raises the question of how individuals may be led to act in an unethical way while remaining “conventional,” that is, attached to the dominant social norms.…”
Section: Theoretical Framework Of the Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the limitations of these studies is that they have said little about the consequences of this conflict of norms on the members of the organization who are led to carry out such actions on behalf of their company. Yet employees may find it difficult to bridge the gap between their personal norms and those of the organization (Sachet-Milliat, 2005, 2016). This second conflict – between deviant organizational norms and individual norms – raises the question of how individuals may be led to act in an unethical way while remaining “conventional,” that is, attached to the dominant social norms.…”
Section: Theoretical Framework Of the Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%