2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2007.05.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complication Rate of Venous Access Procedures Performed by a Radiology Practitioner Assistant Compared with Interventional Radiology Physicians and Supervised Trainees

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In comparison, IR faculty members had a 1.3% overall complication rate, whereas IR fellows had an overall complication rate of 0.56%. A similar study evaluating the safety of a single RA performing central venous access procedures was performed by Benham et al [16]. In their study, the authors showed that their single RA had a 0.29% major complication rate and a 0.89% overall complication rate; these were not statistically different from the complication rates of attending physicians (major, 0%; overall, 1.71%) and IR fellows (major, 0.35%; overall, 1.06%).…”
Section: Procedural Safetymentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In comparison, IR faculty members had a 1.3% overall complication rate, whereas IR fellows had an overall complication rate of 0.56%. A similar study evaluating the safety of a single RA performing central venous access procedures was performed by Benham et al [16]. In their study, the authors showed that their single RA had a 0.29% major complication rate and a 0.89% overall complication rate; these were not statistically different from the complication rates of attending physicians (major, 0%; overall, 1.71%) and IR fellows (major, 0.35%; overall, 1.06%).…”
Section: Procedural Safetymentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The frequency with which NPs and PAs perform imageguided vascular and nonvascular procedures is increasing at the national level [15][16][17]. Such national validated data for RAs, however, are lacking.…”
Section: Procedural Safetymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A retrospective review found that in central venous access procedures, practitioner assistants demonstrated no higher complication rates compared with IR physicians. 16 The same benefits driving this trend in the United Stares-increased access to IR procedures at a lower cost-would no doubt be desirable in LMIC.…”
Section: Establish the Baselinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Central venous access procedures, thoracenteses, paracenteses, and percutaneous liver and kidney biopsies are some of the more common procedures performed by NPs and PAs in radiology departments [22][23][24][25][26][27]. The ability and safety of nonphysician providers to perform such procedures are discussed in detail in part 2 of this series.…”
Section: Invasive Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A single retrospective study in 2007 examined central venous access procedures performed by a single individual certified as a radiologist practitioner assistant [24] and reported equivalent safety complications with procedures performed by physicians. However, outcomes related to other services rendered by RAs are otherwise largely unknown.…”
Section: Rasmentioning
confidence: 99%