2012
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1204.4671
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complexity of OM factorizations of polynomials over local fields

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

3
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If δ = 0, then B p = A p [θ]; thus, we assume δ > 0 in our analysis. By [1,Thm. 3.14], for the computation of a p-integral basis of B/A we may work modulo p δ+1 .…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…If δ = 0, then B p = A p [θ]; thus, we assume δ > 0 in our analysis. By [1,Thm. 3.14], for the computation of a p-integral basis of B/A we may work modulo p δ+1 .…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let us briefly recall how the Montes algorithm proceeds to obtain further dissections of the subsets P ϕ . We use the version of the algorithm described in [1,Sec. 4], guaranteeing that the OM representations t P have order r P + 1, where r P is the Okutsu depth of F P .…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The original version of the Montes algorithm produces a more comprehensive output, but we require only ind p(t) . Admitting fast multiplication, it is shown in [1,Theorem 5.14]…”
Section: Algebraic Function Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to our tests, the running time of the genus computation is in most of the cases dominated by the computation and factorization of the discriminant of a defining polynomial of F . The complexity estimation for the Montes algorithm in [1] affords us concrete bounds for the number of operations in the finite constant field k, which are needed to compute the genus of F (Theorem 3.6). Unfortunately, these theoretical bounds do not fit well with the practical performance of the method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%