2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsc.2014.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genus computation of global function fields

Abstract: In this paper we present an algorithm that computes the genus of a global function field. Let F/k be function field over a field k, and let k 0 be the full constant field of F/k. By using lattices over subrings of F , we can express the genus g of F in terms of [k 0 : k] and the indices of certain orders of the finite and infinite maximal orders of F . If k is a finite field, the Montes algorithm computes the latter indices as a by-product. This leads us to a fast computation of the genus of global function fi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Otherwise, N = S + S ′ is the Newton polygon whose left end point is the vector sum of the two left end points of S and S ′ , and whose sides are the join of S and S ′ , considered with increasing slopes from left to right (see Figure 4). The two first equalities are a consequence of equation (2) and Lemma 2.6. In order to prove the third, let g = 0≤s a s φ s , h = 0≤t b t φ t be the φ-expansions of g, h, respectively.…”
Section: Newton Polygonsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Otherwise, N = S + S ′ is the Newton polygon whose left end point is the vector sum of the two left end points of S and S ′ , and whose sides are the join of S and S ′ , considered with increasing slopes from left to right (see Figure 4). The two first equalities are a consequence of equation (2) and Lemma 2.6. In order to prove the third, let g = 0≤s a s φ s , h = 0≤t b t φ t be the φ-expansions of g, h, respectively.…”
Section: Newton Polygonsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Clearly, conditions (2) and (3) are equivalent. Let us show that (1) implies (2). Suppose that g is µ ′ -minimal; write g = G + H, where G is the sum of all monomials a s φ s with µ ′ (a s φ s ) = µ ′ (g) and H is the sum of all…”
Section: Newton Polygonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…J.-D. Bauch has developed a Magma package +Divisors.m where divisors are manipulated as such pairs D = (I, I ∞ ), and ideals are handled as OM representations. This approach leads to fast OM routines to compute the genus of a curve [1] and the divisor of a function. Also, it yields an acceleration of the classical methods to compute k-bases of the Riemann-Roch spaces of divisors defined over k.…”
Section: Outputmentioning
confidence: 99%