2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.automatica.2016.01.063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complexity of equilibrium in competitive diffusion games on social networks

Abstract: In this paper, we consider the competitive diffusion game, and study the existence of its pure-strategy Nash equilibrium when defined over general undirected networks. We first determine the set of pure-strategy Nash equilibria for two special but wellknown classes of networks, namely the lattice and the hypercube. Characterizing the utility of the players in terms of graphical distances of their initial seed placements to other nodes in the network, we show that in general networks the decision process on the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is usually assumed that the seeding strategy of the competitors has already been fixed and is known. Nash equilibrium analysis has been proposed in the case in which all competitors may adapt their strategy in a game theoretic perspective [10].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is usually assumed that the seeding strategy of the competitors has already been fixed and is known. Nash equilibrium analysis has been proposed in the case in which all competitors may adapt their strategy in a game theoretic perspective [10].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kermani et al [30] used evolutionary game theory to identify the most influential node in information propagation. Etesami et al [31] studied a class of games known as diffusion games that model the competitive behavior of a set of social actors on an undirected, connected social network.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A vast literature exists on multi-agent dynamics in social networks, although mostly focused on consensus and cooperation (see, e.g., [16], [24], [25], [26], [27] and bibliographies therein). Yet, in social dynamics, a very important role is played by competition [4], [35]: social agents often have conflicting goals [8], [18], [23], compete for shared resources [7] (a well-studied phenomenon in ecology [3], [32]), or rival for supremacy in social networks [17], [34], races [9], [10], economy [6], [20], [21], [29] and politics [31]. Antagonistic interactions [1], [2], [22] can arise when an agent obstructs or undermines another in the fight for survival or supremacy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%