2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.rehab.2016.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complex regional pain syndrome associated with hyperattention rather than neglect for the healthy side: A comprehensive case study

Abstract: Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is a dehabilitating chronic condition occurring with peripheral lesions. There is growing consensus for a central contribution to CRPS. Although the nature of this central body representation disorder is increasingly debated, it has been repeatedly argued that CRPS results in motor neglect of the affected side. The present article describes a comprehensive and quantitative case report demonstrating that: (1) not all patients with chronic CRPS exhibit decreased spatial atte… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
20
1
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
5
20
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The available studies on assessment and treatment described here need to be replicated in larger and higher-methodological quality studies with appropriate control groups, in order to confirm preliminary results emerged, and to determine whether perceptual disorders represent clinical consistent findings. At the same time, we encourage the production of diagnostic case studies/case series and the publication of preliminary validation studies aimed to describe new assessment and treatment methodology in MDRDs as already made in CRPS (Sumitani et al, 2007a;Uematsu et al, 2009;Christophe et al, 2016;Solcà et al, 2018). We think that these two preliminary steps may be useful starting points before large scale data collection, as in the case of Adamczyk et al (2018a,b).…”
Section: Recommendation For Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The available studies on assessment and treatment described here need to be replicated in larger and higher-methodological quality studies with appropriate control groups, in order to confirm preliminary results emerged, and to determine whether perceptual disorders represent clinical consistent findings. At the same time, we encourage the production of diagnostic case studies/case series and the publication of preliminary validation studies aimed to describe new assessment and treatment methodology in MDRDs as already made in CRPS (Sumitani et al, 2007a;Uematsu et al, 2009;Christophe et al, 2016;Solcà et al, 2018). We think that these two preliminary steps may be useful starting points before large scale data collection, as in the case of Adamczyk et al (2018a,b).…”
Section: Recommendation For Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Evidence emerged across included studies seemed to highlight the absence of SpP dysfunctions, at least for the extra-personal space measured through the CRAF test in a sample of patients with CNP and WAD: errors in SSV and SVO were under the limit of normality or very modest, and were not correlated with disability. The lack of studies conducted in disorders different than CNP and WAD makes it difficult to extent these findings to others MDRDs, or to compare these results with those found in CRPS (Sumitani et al, 2007a,b;Uematsu et al, 2009;Reinersmann et al, 2012;Christophe et al, 2016).…”
Section: Space Perceptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Manual straight-ahead pointing (eyes closed) Bias towards the affected side of space Christophe et al [53], N = 1, NC, BL; Jacquin-Courtois et al [54], N = 1, NC, HC, AL…”
Section: Tactile Distance Judgements Following Tool Usementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Line bisection Bias towards the affected relative to unaffected side of space Christophe et al [53], N = 1, NC, BL; Jacquin-Courtois et al [54], N = 1, HC, NC, AL; Förderreuther et al [37], N = 29, HC, BL Bias away from the affected relative to unaffected side of space Robinson et al [65], N = 1, NC…”
Section: Visuomotor Spatial Attentionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation