2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0269-7491(00)00154-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complex interactions between autotrophs in shallow marine and freshwater ecosystems: implications for community responses to nutrient stress

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
88
1
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
2
88
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Light reduction caused decreased leaf, rhizome and root elongation rates, followed by diminished production. This phenomenon has been widely recorded in previous studies, independently of the nature of the screen used (Philippart 1995, Short & Burdick 1995, Longstaff & Denninson 1999, Moore & Wetzel 2000, Havens et al 2001, Nelson & Lee 2001, Ruíz & Romero 2001, Peralta et al 2002, Brun et al 2003a. Non-structural carbohydrates were mobilized, both in above-and belowground tissues, to meet carbon demands under light limitation (Alcoverro et al 1999, Ruíz & Romero 2001, Peralta et al 2002, Brun et al 2003a, with the capacity of sucrose formation and exportation restricted in aboveground tissues, and sink strength stimulated in belowground tissues, under low light (Brun et al 2003a).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Light reduction caused decreased leaf, rhizome and root elongation rates, followed by diminished production. This phenomenon has been widely recorded in previous studies, independently of the nature of the screen used (Philippart 1995, Short & Burdick 1995, Longstaff & Denninson 1999, Moore & Wetzel 2000, Havens et al 2001, Nelson & Lee 2001, Ruíz & Romero 2001, Peralta et al 2002, Brun et al 2003a. Non-structural carbohydrates were mobilized, both in above-and belowground tissues, to meet carbon demands under light limitation (Alcoverro et al 1999, Ruíz & Romero 2001, Peralta et al 2002, Brun et al 2003a, with the capacity of sucrose formation and exportation restricted in aboveground tissues, and sink strength stimulated in belowground tissues, under low light (Brun et al 2003a).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…However, the data presented here show that the addition of DOC released from Ulva rigida increases net growth, as a surplus of carbon, for Z. noltii maintenance under low light conditions. In this sense, Z. marina production was unaffected under 2 cm of macroalgal canopy height after 3 mo (Havens et al 2001). More insights in the possible uptake of DOC by seagrasses come from axenic cultures of Thalassia testudinum (Durako 1988) and Ruppia maritima (Rose & Durako 1994), where the reduction in root production in an axenic enriched sucrose medium was explained as a possible nutrient sufficiency with a reduced allocation to nutrient-absorptive root tissues.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Some systems have shown a phytoplankton dominated-response (Taylor et al, 1995) while others presented macroalgal dominance (Lavery and McComb, 1991;Valiela et al, 1992). Shallow coastal estuaries with low nutrient availability in the water are more likely to be dominated by benthic algae and vascular plants due to the potential of these species to sequester nutrients from the sediments (Sand-Jensen and Borum, 1991;Havens et al, 2001). On the other hand, in systems with increased nutrient loading phytoplankton and/or macroalgae will dominate over vascular plants (Sand-Jensen and Borum, 1991.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, in systems with increased nutrient loading phytoplankton and/or macroalgae will dominate over vascular plants (Sand-Jensen and Borum, 1991. Valiela et al, 1997: Havens et al, 2001.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan (CERP) aims to address the major impacts of these hydrological diversions and impoundments and to ecologically restore this wetland by, e.g., increasing clean freshwater flow into ENP (evergladesrestoration.gov). To inform such restoration efforts, various authors have been studying the effects of drying frequency on mat primary production [42,43] and on nutrient fluxes in plant and algal communities [29,31,44,45 Figure 1) and randomly assorted into 72 beakers (400 mL) that were kept in cool, dark conditions until the start of the experiment. The mats in this region are representative of the "short-hydroperiod" (6-9 months flooding duration and more than one wet-dry cycle per year) of the upstream areas of the TS/Ph and SRS drainages [25,32].…”
Section: Study Regionmentioning
confidence: 99%