2012
DOI: 10.1080/13573322.2012.728528
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complex and nonlinear pedagogy and the implications for physical education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
68
0
7

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
68
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…There is adequate evidence to support that human learning is nonlinear in nature and, therefore, teaching and coaching should account for such nonlinearity (see Chow & Atencio, 2012;Tan, Chow, & Davids, 2012). Based on ideas from Newell (1986) and Davids et al (2008), a constraints-led approach has been vigorously presented to promote the understanding of how goal-directed behavior can emerge as a consequence of the interacting constraints (task, environment, and performer) in a learning or performance situation (see Renshaw, Chow, Davids, & Hammond, 2010 for a comprehensive discussion on a constraints-lead approach).…”
Section: More Than a Constraints-led Approachmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There is adequate evidence to support that human learning is nonlinear in nature and, therefore, teaching and coaching should account for such nonlinearity (see Chow & Atencio, 2012;Tan, Chow, & Davids, 2012). Based on ideas from Newell (1986) and Davids et al (2008), a constraints-led approach has been vigorously presented to promote the understanding of how goal-directed behavior can emerge as a consequence of the interacting constraints (task, environment, and performer) in a learning or performance situation (see Renshaw, Chow, Davids, & Hammond, 2010 for a comprehensive discussion on a constraints-lead approach).…”
Section: More Than a Constraints-led Approachmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…There is increasing acceptance that individual differences among learners need to be accounted for when practitioners plan teaching interventions in any learning contexts (Chow & Atencio, 2012). The focus is on the individual and pedagogical practices will have to cater to the dynamic and complex interactions that occur between learners, the task and the environmental constraints (Chow, Davids, Hristovski, Araújo, & Passos, 2011;Renshaw, Davids et al, 470 J. Y. Chow 2010).…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Responding to the constraints within game play requires the learner to process information (perception) and provide movement responses (action), forming a perception-action coupling (Gibson, 1979). This process contextualizes learning of skills within the games they will be played in, with skills learnt more likely to be transferrable to actual game performance situations (Chow and Atencio, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perhaps merging TGfU and CLT as more holistic NP could enhance significant skill execution in game play. However, limited research has been undertaken globally and in Malaysia to investigated the effectiveness non-linear pedagogy (NP) with merging TGfU with of CLT [6,7,8] which emphasizes on decision making tactics and skill execution during game play [21]. In particular, limited research has been undertaken to investigate the merged model of TGfU with CLT as a holistic Non-Linear game pedagogy (NP) approach in Malaysian secondary school game based curriculum such badminton game especially, investigating the effect of tactical decision making when and where to send long or short shot,, recovery movement to base, skill execution of drop shot and smash and the process on how badminton learning takes place, interacting with environment, performance and task prepared by teacher.…”
Section: Introduction and Problem Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%