2002
DOI: 10.1006/mpev.2001.1045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complete Mitochondrial DNA of the Hagfish, Eptatretus burgeri: The Comparative Analysis of Mitochondrial DNA Sequences Strongly Supports the Cyclostome Monophyly

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

5
63
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
5
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Molecular phylogenies tend to support the monophyletic status of a hagfish/lamprey clade (Forey & Janvier, 1993;Delabre et al, 2002;Furlong & Holland, 2002;Takezaki et al, 2003), however. Either phylogenetic hypothesis together with the Quartet Mapping data and the previously published results for lamprey (Fried et al, 2003) have two implications.…”
Section: Treementioning
confidence: 94%
“…Molecular phylogenies tend to support the monophyletic status of a hagfish/lamprey clade (Forey & Janvier, 1993;Delabre et al, 2002;Furlong & Holland, 2002;Takezaki et al, 2003), however. Either phylogenetic hypothesis together with the Quartet Mapping data and the previously published results for lamprey (Fried et al, 2003) have two implications.…”
Section: Treementioning
confidence: 94%
“…After a long-standing controversy on the phylogenetic positions of hagfishes and lampreys, the monophyly of cyclostomes has been unequivocally supported by molecular phylogenetics using a triad of molecules frequently used for reconstruction of species phylogeny, namely, mitochondrial genes (mtDNA), nuclear ribosomal RNA genes (rDNA), and nuclear protein-coding genes (nuDNA) ( Fig. 1; Stock and Whitt, 1992;Mallatt and Sullivan, 1998;Kuraku et al, 1999;Delarbre et al, 2002;Furlong and Holland, 2002;Takezaki et al, 2003;Blair and Hedges, 2005;Delsuc et al, 2006). Therefore, our interest in cyclostome evolution has shifted to the topological and temporal aspects of divergence patterns within this animal group.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This phylogenetic pattern implied that cyclostomes could throw light on the early steps of the assembly of the vertebrate body plan and that hagfishes could document the most generalized condition for a number of vertebrate characters (6). However, it soon raised heated debates, because an increasingly large number of molecular sequence data provided increasingly strong support for the old theory of cyclostomes monophyly (7,8); that is, hagfishes and lampreys were actually sister groups that had diverged in the early Paleozoic, up to 500 million years (Myr) ago. Morphologists who defended cylostome paraphyly argued that molecular sequence-based trees were inconclusive because of the uncertainty as to the outgroups of the vertebrates (i.e., their closest relatives and either tunicates of amphioxus) (Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%