1990
DOI: 10.1016/0022-0736(90)90121-h
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complementary nature of electrocardiographic and magnetocardiographic data in patients with ischemic heart disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
32
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
4
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…23,24 The MCG expressed in µAmpere is comparable with BSPM measured in miniVolts to the extent that the number of recording sites is increased in the latter to a minimum of 120 leads. 25 In the discussion why MCG contributes additional information to the understanding of the heart's electrophysiology, the registration of vortex components of the magnetic field was suggested as the physical explanation. 26 Using this potential for the analysis of spatial aspects of cardiac activity, we could show previously that patients with CAD could be identified at rest because of their increased heterogeneity of repolarization as revealed by temporal and spatial changes of QT dispersion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23,24 The MCG expressed in µAmpere is comparable with BSPM measured in miniVolts to the extent that the number of recording sites is increased in the latter to a minimum of 120 leads. 25 In the discussion why MCG contributes additional information to the understanding of the heart's electrophysiology, the registration of vortex components of the magnetic field was suggested as the physical explanation. 26 Using this potential for the analysis of spatial aspects of cardiac activity, we could show previously that patients with CAD could be identified at rest because of their increased heterogeneity of repolarization as revealed by temporal and spatial changes of QT dispersion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MCG is more sensitive to the terminal phase of the depolarization when the activation wavefront occurs in a more tangential direction than at the initial part [53]. ECG (the isointegral BSPM maps) shows abnormalities mainly during the depolarization period, whereas in MCG, better discrimination results from use of the abnormalities in the repolarization period [54]. MCG is also not affected by conductivity variations caused by the lungs, pericardial effusion, muscles, and skin, unlike ECG [51].…”
Section: Main Differences Between Mcg and Ecgmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23 The MCG is also sensitive to circular vortex currents, not detectable by the ECG and it has been shown to contain information complementary to the ECG. 2,9,16 In the normal heart, the main direction of the activation wave front is radial, from the endocardium to the epicardium. Thus the MCG may show deviations from the normal activation direction induced by, e.g., myocardial ischemia with better accuracy than the ECG.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%