The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2014.04.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Competitor suppresses neuronal representation of food reward in the nucleus accumbens/medial striatum of domestic chicks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Involvement of the Ac in long‐term changes following social stress is further substantiated by recent observations on differential expression of a number of transcripts in the Ac of mice exposed to social stress as compared with those with no social stress (Lo Iacono et al ., ). In young chicks, the firing rate of mSt/Ac neurones changed during foraging tasks if a competitor conspecific was present (Amita & Matsushima, ), however, mSt/Ac lesions did not affect social facilitation in young chicks (Ogura et al ., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Involvement of the Ac in long‐term changes following social stress is further substantiated by recent observations on differential expression of a number of transcripts in the Ac of mice exposed to social stress as compared with those with no social stress (Lo Iacono et al ., ). In young chicks, the firing rate of mSt/Ac neurones changed during foraging tasks if a competitor conspecific was present (Amita & Matsushima, ), however, mSt/Ac lesions did not affect social facilitation in young chicks (Ogura et al ., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, localized lesion and pharmacological manipulation studies have reported critical involvement of the striatum in reinforcement learning (Annett et al, 1989; Izawa et al, 2001; Ichikawa et al, 2004; Clarke et al, 2008; Rueda-Orozco et al, 2008; Castañé et al, 2010; Ogura et al, 2015). Third, during reinforcement tasks, striatal neurons show reward-related activities both before and after mammals (Tremblay et al, 1998; Janak et al, 2004; Apicella et al, 2009; Kim et al, 2009) and birds (Yanagihara et al, 2001; Izawa et al, 2005; Amita and Matsushima, 2014) receive a reward.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In neuronal recordings from chicks performing the operant pecking task, both the medial striatum (MSt) (Yanagihara et al, 2001) and arcopallium (Arco, an associative area in the avian telencephalon, Aoki et al, 2003) have been found to code rewards and prediction of rewards. Particularly, some MSt neurons show a sequence of characteristic burst activities during the cue period, the post-operant delay period, and/or the reward period of the task (Izawa et al, 2005; Amita and Matsushima, 2014). Localized MSt lesions cause impulsive choices (Izawa et al, 2003) while Arco lesions cause cost-averse choices (Aoki et al, 2006), suggesting the involvement of these areas in foraging decision making.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, foraging decisions are socially modulated by conspecific individuals. Choice impulsiveness in chicks can be conditionally enhanced by competitive training experiences (Amita et al, 2010), and this enhancement might involve the suppression of striatal neuronal activities, as elicited by the presence of the accompanying forager (Amita & Matsushima, 2014). Furthermore, foraging effort (Ogura & Matsushima, 2011) and operant peck latency (Amita & Matsushima, 2011) are socially facilitated in a reversible and contextual manner.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%