1984
DOI: 10.1016/s0003-3472(84)80341-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Competitive resource sharing: A simulation model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
41
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
3
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They also contend that the empirical evidence supporting the RPS is weak. This point is also made by Kacelnik and Krebs (1985) who cast doubt on Milinski (1984) and Regelmann's (1984) application of the RPS in their analysis of stickleback behaviour.…”
Section: A Patch Assessment Modelsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…They also contend that the empirical evidence supporting the RPS is weak. This point is also made by Kacelnik and Krebs (1985) who cast doubt on Milinski (1984) and Regelmann's (1984) application of the RPS in their analysis of stickleback behaviour.…”
Section: A Patch Assessment Modelsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Some individual-based simulations have predicted a decrease in patch switching (Regelmann 1984;Bernstein et al 1991;Cezilly and Boy 1991). Kennedy and Gray (1993) and Morris (1987) analytically predicted that with greater travel costs there would be greater skewing of the distribution toward richer patches than the IFD would predict, as individuals would be attracted unidirectionally toward the richer patches.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The IFD has seen success in describing habitat selection (Lin and Batzli 2001;Pusenius and Schmidt 2002) and the distributions of foraging animals in the field (e.g., Harper 1982;Oksanen et al 1995;Jones et al 2006) and in laboratory experiments (e.g. , Milinski 1979;Regelmann 1984;Korona 1990). The IFD corresponds to an evolutionarily stable strategy (ESS; a strategy that if adopted by a population prevents invasion by another population that is initially rare and uses a different strategy; e.g., Cressman et al 2004;Cantrell et al 2007; Křivan et al 2008), for which at steady state no individual can improve fitness by moving to another patch.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the studies generally support ideal free models, quantitative discrepancies between predictions and observations are common. The mechanisms invoked to account for these discrepancies, such as asymmetries in priority of access to a point food source (Harper 1982), the need for individuals to sample alternative resource clumps (Milinski 1984) and the switching between clumps that ensues (Regelmann 1984) easily apply at small spatial scales but are unlikely to account for discrepancies at large spatial scales such as choice of breeding habitats (Stamps 2001;Shochat et al 2002). The behavioural mechanisms that could account for such large-scale discrepancies remain relatively unexplored because studies conducted at large spatial scales, generally, ignore behaviour altogether and focus instead on broad environmental correlates of animal distributions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%