2012
DOI: 10.1049/iet-rsn.2011.0038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Competitive Gaussian mixture probability hypothesis density filter for multiple target tracking in the presence of ambiguity and occlusion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The thresholds 0.5    and ε = 3 are selected empirically during the experiments. For each simulation-tracking scenario, 100 Monte Carlo runs are performed, where the mean number of target estimate (NTE) errors [27] and the optimal sub-pattern assignment (OSPA) [28] are used to assess the performance of the proposed algorithm. where the true target set and estimated target set are denoted by X k and ˆk X , respectively.…”
Section: Measurement-driven Gaussian Mixture Phd Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The thresholds 0.5    and ε = 3 are selected empirically during the experiments. For each simulation-tracking scenario, 100 Monte Carlo runs are performed, where the mean number of target estimate (NTE) errors [27] and the optimal sub-pattern assignment (OSPA) [28] are used to assess the performance of the proposed algorithm. where the true target set and estimated target set are denoted by X k and ˆk X , respectively.…”
Section: Measurement-driven Gaussian Mixture Phd Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before penalization, the weight matrix should be analysed first to determine the ambiguous weights. In the CGM-PHD tracker [ 20 ], PGM-PHD tracker [ 21 ] and CPGM-PHD tracker [ 22 ], the weight of target i is determined as an ambiguous weight once the total weight of the i -th row is greater than one. However, this method is not applicable to Case 2 (as stated in Section 2.3 ) since the total weight may be less than one when targets approach each other.…”
Section: Improved Gm-phd Tracker With Weight Penalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, the efficiency of the GM-PHD tracker may degrade when targets come near each other. To remedy this, Yazdian-Dehkordi et al proposed a competitive GM-PHD (CGM-PHD) tracker [ 20 ] and a penalized GM-PHD (PGM-PHD) tracker [ 21 ] to refine the weights of the close moving targets in the update step in the GM-PHD filter. However, they did not provide continuous trajectories for the targets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tracking of multi-sensor multi-target based on the GM-PHD filter is also studied in [22] and tracking of manoeuvring targets using this filter is considered in [23,24]. Recently, Yazdian-Dehkordi et al [25][26][27] proposed the competitive GM-PHD (CGM-PHD) filter and the penalised GM-PHD (PGM-PHD) filter to improve the performance of the GM-PHD filter for tracking closely spaced and occluded targets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%