2016
DOI: 10.1049/iet-spr.2014.0480
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novel N ‐scan GM‐PHD‐based approach for multi‐target tracking

Abstract: The GM-PHD-based filter has been proposed as an alternative of the PHD filter to estimate the first-order moment of the multi-target posterior density. The GM-PHD filter utilises a weighted summation of Gaussian components to estimate the target states. This filter and its recent variants perform state extraction of the targets based on the target weights. However, due to different uncertainties such as noisy observation, miss-detection, clutter or occlusion, the weight of a target is decreased and the estimat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 26 publications
(102 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…have been of significant interest due to their superior performance in terms of accuracy of cardinality and state estimation of multiple targets with their trajectories. Vo–Vo filter [2, 5] provides a closed‐form solution to the optimal Bayesian filter, and has shown to outperform the well‐known probability hypothesis density (PHD) filter [6, 7] and its cardinalised version, CPHD filter [8], and the multi‐Berboulli (MB) filter [9] in challenging multi‐target tracking scenarios.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…have been of significant interest due to their superior performance in terms of accuracy of cardinality and state estimation of multiple targets with their trajectories. Vo–Vo filter [2, 5] provides a closed‐form solution to the optimal Bayesian filter, and has shown to outperform the well‐known probability hypothesis density (PHD) filter [6, 7] and its cardinalised version, CPHD filter [8], and the multi‐Berboulli (MB) filter [9] in challenging multi‐target tracking scenarios.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%