Competition, Predation, and the Structure of the Ambystoma‐Rana Sylvatica Community

Abstract

Populations of six species of amphibians were manipulated in field enclosures to study the biological tractability of current concepts of . the organization of natural communities. Experimental communities with a known composition of mature eggs were introduced into screen enclosures in a pond to assay the importance of competition and predation to the ecology of amphibian larvae in temporary ponds. The competitive ability of each population was measured by its survivorship, mean length of its larval period, and mean weight at metamorphosis. Three simultaneous experiments (requiring 70 enclosures and 137 populations) were replicated in a randomized complete-block design for variance analysis.The assumptions of the classical Lotka-Volterra model of competition were tested by raising Ambystoma laterale, Ambystoma tremblayi, and Ambystoma maculatum in all combinations of three initial densities (0, 32, and 64). All three measures of competitive ability were affected by competition with other species. Higher-order interactions decreased the variance of the outcomes of the experiments as species were added to the communities. The statistical effects of these higher-order interactions between the densities of competing species often exceeded the simple effects of competition. The increase in community stability with the addition of species to the community is not predicted by the classical models of community ecology.The second experiment tested the effects of adjacent trophic levels on the structure of the three-species community. Eggs of Ambystoma tigrinum, a predator, and Rana sylvatica, an alternate prey of Ambystoma tigrinum, were added singly and together into systems with 16 eggs of species in the Maculatum species-group. Ambystoma tigrinum was a predator if it acquired an initial size advantage by preying on Rana sylvatica tadpoles; otherwise it was principally a competitor. Rana sylvatica adversely affected the Maculatum group by competing with invertebrate prey for periphyton and photoplankton. The three species in the Maculatum group had nearly the same response to the addition of both A. tigrinum and R. sylvatica.Ambystoma texanum, which occurs sporadically in southern Michigan at the northern limit of its range but not on the study area, was introduced as a test for community saturation. Ambystoma texanum was successfully raised alone. When mixed with the Maculatum group, Ambystoma texanum had a low survivorship, a small body size, and a long larval period. The native species were affected equally by the introduction of Ambystoma texanum, demonstrating the complexity of the food web and the ecological pliability of salamander larvae.The uncertainty of the temporary pond environment precludes extreme ecological specialization among these species of salamanders. Coexistence is a consequence of the relative advantages of the species in different years and the long adult life spans. The complexity of the food web and "predator switching" are probably important elements of the densitydependent interactions that...

Synergy of multiple partners, including freeloaders, increases host fitness in a multispecies mutualism

“…41-43). It has long been known that characterizing the net effects of interactions in multispecies communities entails understanding the direct and indirect effects of those species on one another (44,45). However, natural selection acts on lifetime fitness, and the fitness of long-lived mutualists is determined by the temporally integrated effects of multiple partners.…”

Sex‐ and context‐dependent migration in a pond‐breeding amphibian

“…Few partial migration studies on vertebrates, however, have shown density effects using replicated field experiments, probably because of the difficulties of enclosing wide-ranging animals. However, density effects are well known in the ecological literature, documented in topics ranging from dispersal to metamorphosis, disease, and phenotypic plasticity (e.g., Wilbur 1972, Matthysen 2005. Most commonly, environments under increasing density induce change in individuals, ranging from changes in habitat to spatial location, diet, behavior, or phenotype.…”

Spatial distribution and survival rate of waterfrog tadpoles in relation to biotic and abiotic factors: a field experiment

“…Several studies have shown that growth and survival are density-dependent with competition for food being one of the most important factors (Brockelman, 1969;Wilbur, 1972Wilbur, , 1976. Differential growth rates may not only contribute to unequal competitive abilities but also appear to affect predation risk (SmithGill and Gill, 1978;Wilbur, 1980).…”