Data from two shallow macrophyte-dominated lakes (Eastern Poland) sampled with standardized methods, were evaluated in order to examine the effects of various stands of macrophytes in predicting protozooplankton community structure. Differences in macrophyte structure led to two distinct groups of habitats having different patterns of ciliate distribution. The first group consists of two vegetated habitats of sparse stem density and of the open water zone, and the second of submerged macrophyte species, which were more dense and complex. The number of significant correlations was different in the studied habitats. In central zones of macrophyte habitats the number of ciliates had the strongest correlation with concentrations of total organic carbon and P tot . On the other side in the border zone a significant correlation between the number of ciliates and the chlorophyll a concentration was found.
IntroductionAlternate stable theory typically deals with shallow moderately productive to productive lakes. The two major groups of primary producers are macrophytes and phytoplankton (PECKHAM et al., 2006). Ecological theory proposed that shallow lakes appear in two major alternate stable states -one dominated by aquatic macrophytes and the other by phytoplankton. The crux of the alternate stable state theory is that within an intermediate range of nutrient loading, characteristic of moderately eutrophic and eutrophic lakes, primary productivity can by dominated by either littoral macrophyte or pelagic phytoplankton communities (SCHEFFER et al., 1993;PECKHAM et al., 2006). Littoral habitats with emergent and submerged macrophytes serve as important sinks for nutrients that enter the lake and as major regulators of nutrient dynamics in lake ecosystems through habitat coupling (WET-ZEL, 2001;SCHINDLER and SCHEUERELL, 2002). When water is clear because of macrophyte dominance, nutrients are tied up in macrophytes, slowing algal growth. Littoral zones in shallow lakes constitute a mosaic of vertical and horizontal microhabitats provided by emergent and submerged macrophytes and open patches. The structure, as well as the trophic interactions of macrophyte-associated littoral food webs is inherently complex. High habitat structural complexity increases the spatial separation of refuges, thus limiting populations, influencing consumer-resource dynamics and weakening the strength of trophic cascades through efficiency of predators (SHURIN et al., 2002). Dense macrophyte beds can act as a refuge for large zooplankton species, which in turn control the phytoplankton and this www.revhydro.com may affect also the structure and function of the microbial community (SCHRIVER et al., 1995;JÜRGENS and JEPPESEN, 1997). The partitioning of zooplankton communities within vegetation in macrophyte-dominated lakes is well known for some invertebrate species and fish (DOWNING and CYR, 1986;KAIRESALO et al., 2000; NURMINEN and HORPPILA, 2002;KUCZYŃSKA-KIPPEN, 2005). Protozoa represent a main component of zooplankton and play a signif...