1996
DOI: 10.1086/262040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Competition and Corporate Performance

Abstract: Since the beginning of the Industrial Revolution, technological change has led to the automation of existing tasks and the creation of new ones, as well as the reallocation of labor across occupations and industries. These processes have been costly to individual workers, but labor demand has remained strong, and real wages have steadily increased in line with productivity growth. I provide evidence suggesting, however, that in recent decades automation has outpaced the creation of new tasks and thus the deman… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

71
1,141
7
64

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,815 publications
(1,319 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
71
1,141
7
64
Order By: Relevance
“…Glaeser and Mare, 2001), firms perform better (e.g. Nickell, 1996), visual artists peak earlier (Hellmanzik, 2010); but knowledge on causality is still limited. Are geographic clusters attracting the best or are individuals and firms who cluster the best because of positive externalities associated with cluster locations?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Glaeser and Mare, 2001), firms perform better (e.g. Nickell, 1996), visual artists peak earlier (Hellmanzik, 2010); but knowledge on causality is still limited. Are geographic clusters attracting the best or are individuals and firms who cluster the best because of positive externalities associated with cluster locations?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, according to Aghion et al (2005), the relationship is an inverted-U, where competition encourages innovation in firms that operate at similar technological levels and discourages innovation in laggard firms, all caused by the difference between the firm's pre-and post-innovation rents. For further analysis see Hart (1980); Schmidt (1997); Aghion et al (2001); Vives (2008) ;Schmutzler (2009Schmutzler ( , 2013Nickell (1996) ;Blundell, Griffith, and Reenen (1999); Aghion et al (2005); Aghion and Griffith (2006); Aghion et al (2014).…”
Section: A Weak Innovation Climatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…En general, la teoría económica ha relacionado la competitividad entre empresas con un mejor desempeño y mejores prác-ticas (NICKELL, 1996;OKADA, 2005). En el caso de la actividad innovadora, la competitividad entre empresas está ligada con mejores prácticas tecnológicas (BOLDRIN y otros, 2011).…”
Section: Revisión De Literatura Y Hipótesisunclassified