Competency Based Future Leadership Requirements

Abstract

Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average lliour per response, Including the time for reviewing instaictlons, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing this collection of information. Send comments regardng this burden estimate or any other aspect of this coUection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden to Department of Defense, Washington HeaAguartens Services, Diractorata for Information Operafions and Reports (0704-0188), 121S Jefferson Davis Highway, Sutte 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware thai notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be sutiject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of Infomiatlon if it doss not dsplay a currently valid 0MB control number. PLEASE DO NOT RETURN YOUR FORM TO THE ABOVE ADDRESS. REPORT DATE (DD-MM-YYYY) July 2004 REPORT TYPE SPONSOR/MONPTOR'S ACRONYM(S)ARl SPONSOR/MONrrOR'S REPORT NUMBER(S)Technical Report 1148 DISTRIBUTION / AVAILABILITY STATEMENTApproved for public release; distribution is unlimited. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES ABSTRACTThe purpose of this research was to develop leadership requirements for the future Amiy. A competency framework that is used consistently throughout the force and that focuses on the functions of leadership will help align training, development, and perfomnance management processes and better convey what leaders need to do. Numerous considerations were combined to generate the framework including: Identification of the future of technological, geopolitical, and demographic factors; review of leadership theory; review of the evolution of Army leadership doctrine; identification of literature sources of leadership requirements; specification of the relationships leaders have with others; and comparisons of competency frameworks from the other military servk;es. Through an iterative process, analysts developed competencies, components, and sample actions that were then reviewed by subject matter experts. A core leadership competency framework was developed that includes eight competencies and 55 components. The proposed core leadership competency framework serves to provide an analytically based description of leader requirements for the future. The incorporation of the framework into leader development processes is discussed as well as how the framework can be presented in doctrine. IS. SUBJECT TERMS 913-684-9796Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8-98)

A Selective Review of Leadership Studies in the U.S. Army

“…In response to these efforts, the Center for Army Leadership (CAL) sponsored a leader competency study, which sought to produce a set of future leader requirements that would address changes in the Army's mission and force requirements in the future. This study was unique since it involved researchers with past experience in competency efforts with direct application to military and civilian organizations (Horey, Fallesen, Morath, Cronin, & Cassella, 2004). Researchers analyzed the future environment to examine how these changes might impact the Army's mission and force requirements and reviewed existing theories, research, and doctrine to derive a systems model of leaders and followers that identified the essential components and structures involved in the leadership process.…”

The psychological selection profile for civil-military coordination officers in peace-support operations: The results of field research in the Sudan

“…Coordination is one of the roles of the CIMIC officer in PSO (Cockell 2002;De Coning 2005;JP 2003;Pugh 2001;Weinberger 2002). Social interaction is a primary function in the coordination of the military and humanitarian components (Horey et al 2004). The fundamental dimension of extrovert behaviour is more suited to enhance social interaction (Cloninger 1996;Crowne 2007;Ewen 1988).…”

Assessing Army Professional Forums: Metrics for Effectiveness and Impact

“…According to Horey, Fallesen, Morath, Cronin, et al (2004), eight interpersonal competencies characterize the future Army leader. Three that have not already been addressed in previous sections are (1) vitalizing a positive climate; (2) arming self to lead; and (3) extending personal influence.…”