No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden to Washington Headquarters Service, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188) Washington, DC 20503. PLEASE DO NOT RETURN YOUR FORM TO THE ABOVE ADDRESS. 1. REPORT DATE (DD-MM-YYYY) 11-08-20062. REPORT TYPE AUTHOR(S)Christina Curnow, Rebecca Mulvaney, Robert Calderon, Eric Weingart, Kenny Nicely, Heidi Keller-Glaze (Caliber, an ICF International Company) Jon Fallesen (Center for Army Leadership) 5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES)Caliber, an ICF International Company 9300 Lee Highway Fairfax, VA 22031 PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER SPONSOR/MONITOR'S ACRONYM(S) 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES)Center for Army Leadership 250 Gibbon Avenue Fort Leavenworth, KS 66027-2314 SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY REPORT NUMBER 12. DISTRIBUTION AVAILABILITY STATEMENT SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES ABSTRACTThis report describes the development and implementation of an application of advanced learning theories to leadership development. A literature review was conducted to identify advanced learning theories that have been used across disciplines. These learning theories were then operationalized into a six hour training module on influencing others using tactics described by FM 6-22. Pre-and post-test measures of influencing behaviors and the outcomes of these behaviors were also developed. The module was implemented in L310, an optional negotiations course that is part of the Command General Staff College curriculum. Results showed evidence of improvement in influencing behaviors as a result of the module. SUBJECT TERMS LeadershipLearning Theory Influence Training INTRODUCTIONThe purpose of this task was to conduct research to exploit learning technologies to improve leadership development. The goal of the project was to implement an innovative training approach that incorporated advanced learning technologies/theories to encourage faster, deeper learning with respect to "Influencing Others." In this effort we sought to identify, adapt or develop an application of an advanced learning theory and evaluate the impact of the application as it relates to leadership.In this effort we performed the following tasks:Defined leadership as "influencing others" for the purpose of this project BACKGROUND ON LEADERSHIP AND ADVANCED LEARNINGIn this chapter we describe our definitions of leadership and deep learning as well as provide an overview of advanced learning theories. LEADERSHIPWe focused our research on ...

The overall objective of this research was to develop a prototype measure of performance for a collective task; a more thorough description is provided in Curnow, Barney, Bryson, Keller-Glaze and Vowels (2015). To accomplish the objective, a collaborative effort was initiated with a U.S. Army Forces Command (FORSCOM) Military Police (MP) unit to select a task for metric development and then develop and refine a prototype measure for that task. Through collaboration between the research team and the unit, a need for measurement development involving the task of mass casualty triage was identified. Thus, we developed an assessment tool designed to measure the degree to which Soldiers could correctly triage injured civilians during a mass casualty training event. Based on a review of military and civilian literature regarding mass casualty triage and interviews with members of the unit, the triage assessment development involved three steps: (1) identification of key functions associated with mass casualty triage; (2) identification and categorization of subtasks for each task; and (3) review and conversion of tasks and/or subtasks into proper task statements. The Mass Casualty Triage Performance Assessment Tool is ARI Research Product 2015-02.

Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden to Washington Headquarters Service, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188) Washington, DC 20503. PLEASE DO NOT RETURN YOUR FORM TO THE ABOVE ADDRESS. 1. REPORT DATE (DD-MM-YYYY) 11-08-20062. REPORT TYPE AUTHOR(S)Christina Curnow, Rebecca Mulvaney, Robert Calderon, Eric Weingart, Kenny Nicely, Heidi Keller-Glaze (Caliber, an ICF International Company) Jon Fallesen (Center for Army Leadership) 5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES)Caliber, an ICF International Company 9300 Lee Highway Fairfax, VA 22031 PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER SPONSOR/MONITOR'S ACRONYM(S) 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES)Center for Army Leadership 250 Gibbon Avenue Fort Leavenworth, KS 66027-2314 SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY REPORT NUMBER 12. DISTRIBUTION AVAILABILITY STATEMENT SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES ABSTRACTThis report describes the development and implementation of an application of advanced learning theories to leadership development. A literature review was conducted to identify advanced learning theories that have been used across disciplines. These learning theories were then operationalized into a six hour training module on influencing others using tactics described by FM 6-22. Pre-and post-test measures of influencing behaviors and the outcomes of these behaviors were also developed. The module was implemented in L310, an optional negotiations course that is part of the Command General Staff College curriculum. Results showed evidence of improvement in influencing behaviors as a result of the module. SUBJECT TERMS LeadershipLearning Theory Influence Training INTRODUCTIONThe purpose of this task was to conduct research to exploit learning technologies to improve leadership development. The goal of the project was to implement an innovative training approach that incorporated advanced learning technologies/theories to encourage faster, deeper learning with respect to "Influencing Others." In this effort we sought to identify, adapt or develop an application of an advanced learning theory and evaluate the impact of the application as it relates to leadership.In this effort we performed the following tasks:Defined leadership as "influencing others" for the purpose of this project BACKGROUND ON LEADERSHIP AND ADVANCED LEARNINGIn this chapter we describe our definitions of leadership and deep learning as well as provide an overview of advanced learning theories. LEADERSHIPWe focused our research on ...

No abstract