Reclaiming Nature 2007
DOI: 10.7135/upo9781843313465.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compensation for Environmental Services and Rural Communities: Lessons from the Americas

Abstract: In principle, payments for environmental services -such as watershed management, biodiversity conservation, and carbon sequestration -can advance the goals of both environmental protection and poverty reduction. A review of recent initiatives in the Americas suggests, however, that this desirable combination is not automatic. If payments for environmental services (PES) schemes are to be an effective vehicle for strengthening livelihoods in poor rural communities, they must be designed with that objective firm… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0
20

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
(3 reference statements)
1
27
0
20
Order By: Relevance
“…So far, a number of payment schemes at the watershed level have been already implemented, mainly in Latin America and Asia, which allows drawing preliminary lessons (Landell-Mills and Porras, 2002;Mayrand and Paquin, 2004;Warner et al, 2004;Rosa et al, 2004). These schemes stem from the fact that natural or human-managed ecosystems provide positive environmental externalities that normally are not taken into account in individual economic decisions (Pagiola et al, 2002a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far, a number of payment schemes at the watershed level have been already implemented, mainly in Latin America and Asia, which allows drawing preliminary lessons (Landell-Mills and Porras, 2002;Mayrand and Paquin, 2004;Warner et al, 2004;Rosa et al, 2004). These schemes stem from the fact that natural or human-managed ecosystems provide positive environmental externalities that normally are not taken into account in individual economic decisions (Pagiola et al, 2002a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of PES is based on compensation to land holders for the protection or production of environmental services. These services could include an option to ensure climate change mitigation at the lowest cost, an option to ensure environmental services of local or regional interest such as the regulation or filtration of water flows and a possibility to strengthen rural livelihoods and revalue rural landscapes, their diversity of practices and ecosystems (Rosa et al 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The introduction of certified emission reductions, or carbon credits under the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM), or other financial systems such as payment for environmental services or voluntary carbon offsets (Rosa et al 2003;Taiyab 2005;World Bank 2008) create opportunities and may potentially provide incentives to re-vegetate the wastelands. The mitigation potentials of these financial systems, as well as the environmental and socio-economic factors that influence their realisation are not well known due to the short time span since the emergence of the systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, PES schemes can fail or be detrimental to indigenous communities if they fail to incorporate an understanding of how indigenous communities value and use key environmental services for their own subsistence and well being (Rosa et al, 2004). Hence -though PES schemes offer promise -when it comes to indigenous communities, some new challenges need to be considered.…”
Section: Payments For Environmental Servicesmentioning
confidence: 99%